This is the case that could get Trump reinstated.

http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

To be clear, this is not about whether election fraud claims are accurate but rather about whether the refusal of the defendants to investigate them has a retroactive impact on the 2020 Presidential election.

The Department of Justice waived their right to object, which means The Supreme Court of the United States is going to issue an order.

This is all new territory for the United States and no matter what the Court rules, people will be divided in their opinions.

Of particular interest:

“September 28, 2022 Raland received A phone call from SCOTUS. The Clerk of the SCOTUS calls Raland requesting for a revision of the Petition that would include more information on the lawsuit and wondering how soon they could get it.

October 17, 2022, Raland gets a 2nd phone call from SCOTUS
Clerk. She asks “how are you doing on your revision of the Writ with the additional information that we need?” Raland said “We’re working on it as we speak” She said “how soon can we get it?” Raland said “Right away”

“October 20, 2022, the Revised Petition shipped to the SCOTUS.

“October 24, 2022, Petition docketed. The clerk of the Court tells Raland that they have everything they need. The U.S. Attorneys have until Nov 23, 2022 to respond showing why the Supreme Court of the United States should not move on this case. This means that SCOTUS agreed that this case met the Rule 11 criteria or it would not be docketed. It would have been denied and punted back to Circuit 10 appeals court and await a decision.

“So guess what happened on November 23rd?? The United States did not respond. Instead, this happened:

“November 23, 2022: The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys. Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward.”
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/scotus-v-house-critters-charge-that citing http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html