Writing by Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal

Q’s commentary on Iran centers on allegations of high-level corruption within the Obama administration, the nature of the 2010 Iran Nuclear Deal, and a broader geopolitical strategy involving North Korea and Syria.

Q’s claims regarding Iran can be categorized into the following key themes:

The Iran Nuclear Deal as a “Scam”

Q repeatedly characterizes the Iran Nuclear Deal as a “SCAM” that had “nothing to do w/ NUKES”. Instead, Q asserts the deal was orchestrated to:

• Lift sanctions to allow foreign businesses access to an “untapped market” for the enrichment of individuals and corporations.
• Secure a “black site” for clandestine operations.
• Allow the Obama administration (“Hussein”) to send $1.7 billion in cash to Iran via multiple planes and routes, questioning if this money was used for “bribes,” “kickbacks,” or hand-offs to other actors. Q asks who provided security for these transfers and why Congress was kept “in the dark”.

Geopolitical Links (NK, U1, and Syria)

Q frequently links Iran to other major “Q” narratives, such as Uranium One (U1) and North Korea (NK):

• Q questions how both NK and Iran obtained Uranium, suggesting a connection to the U1 scandal.
• Q suggests that Iran provided strategic intelligence and technology to North Korea during the Obama administration.
• Q implies that Iran may have created a classified “satellite” nuclear facility in Northern Syria to circumvent the nuclear deal’s restrictions.
• Q claims that John Brennan and others provided “false intel” regarding Iranian nuclear development and North Korean capabilities.

Allegations Against the Obama Administration

Q frames the Obama administration’s relationship with Iran as treasonous:

• Q alleges that Valerie Jarrett (VJ) and John Kerry acted as “direct relays” to Iran both during and after their time in office.
• Q highlights a 2013 private dinner attended by then-Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and three Democratic congressmen (Keith Ellison, Andre Carson, and Gregory Meeks), calling Rouhani the “#1 state sponsor of terrorism”.
• Q questions who paid for Obama to attend Harvard Law School, suggesting connections to Saudi Royals and potentially influencing future policy toward Iran.

Regime Change and “Iran Next”

Throughout the drops, Q uses the phrase “Iran next” to signal that after dealing with North Korea and Saudi Arabia, the “regime” in Iran would be addressed.

• Q expresses support for the “good people of IRAN” who are “battling their ‘installed’ regime for FREEDOM”.
• Q states that the “deal kept Iran quiet” and that its removal caused “panic” among the “Old Guard” in the UK, France, and Germany, who Q claims were heavily invested in the deal’s continuation for financial reasons.
• Q claimed that the Iran situation would be “resolved by 11-11” (November 11, 2018).

Summary of Key Assertions

• Financial Enrichment: The deal was about money for special interest groups, not world safety.
• Military Leverage: Q mentions “NUKE strike package leverage” and asks why Iran is “funded by the US” despite news regarding drugs and WMDs.
• European Interests: Q claims France and Germany pressured President Trump to stay in the deal to protect their own financial interests, specifically citing $250 billion per year at risk.