This article provides a chronological examination of the specific mentions of Israel and the Mossad within the “Q” posting history, analyzing how these references shaped the evolving narrative of global intelligence and geopolitical power.
- November 11, 2017, 23:32:49 (Post 138): Q included “Israel: Bank of Israel” in an extensive list of international central banks.
Additional Information: This post is a foundational piece of the “Globalist” conspiracy theory within the Q narrative. By listing the Bank of Israel alongside the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England, the narrative suggested that Israel’s financial sovereignty was tied to a worldwide banking “cabal.” This was intended to signal to followers that the “Great Awakening” would eventually target global financial structures across all borders. - March 10, 2018 (Post 916): In response to a user asking, “What about Awan. Is Israel involved?”, Q replied: “We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.”
Additional Information: This post created a central mystery within the movement by introducing an apparent contradiction. While Q had mentioned the entity of Israel previously (as seen in Post 138), this statement claimed that the specific strategic reason for “saving them for last” had never been disclosed. In the Q narrative, mentions of a country’s institutions (like a bank) were treated as “public tier” information, whereas the “specific reason” was framed as a high-level classified secret. This served to keep the community in a state of anticipation, suggesting that Israel’s true role in the “Deep State” was the ultimate revelation that would conclude the operation. - April 30, 2018, 13:38:11 (Post 1307): Q referred to an “Israel disclosure moments ago” as “Authentic.” The context involved questioning the Secretary of State’s presence and noting that France and Germany were pressing the U.S. to remain in the Iran nuclear deal.
Additional Information: This post occurred almost simultaneously with a televised presentation by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding Iranian nuclear documents. Q used the “Authentic” label to bolster the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA). It framed the disclosure as a strategic move to expose European leaders who were allegedly “pressing” the U.S. to maintain the status quo for corrupt reasons. - September 6, 2018, 19:08:46 (Context for Post 2103): While Q did not use the acronym in this specific post, an Anonymous user claimed a “MOS supported asset” was being used to “poison the water” and divide patriots. Q responded by asking what would happen if it were proven that “Free Speech Systems LLC” (InfoWars) was linked to a “Foreign Intel Agency.”
Additional Information: This post targeted the credibility of Alex Jones and InfoWars. By suggesting that a major “alternative” media outlet was actually a front for the Mossad or other foreign intelligence, Q sought to consolidate the loyalty of the audience. The implication was that only the “drops” provided untainted information, while other “patriot” outlets were “controlled opposition.” - September 6, 2018 (Post 2104): Q identified Jerome Corsi as a “Mossad asset/agent” who was allegedly “outed in a 1997 sting operation in London.”
Additional Information: This post was a major turning point that led to internal conflict among conspiracy theorists. By alleging that Corsi was a foreign agent, Q effectively “excommunicated” him from the movement. The reference to a 1997 London sting operation was a call to action for followers to find old news reports to verify the claim, thereby deepening user engagement through DIY investigation. - September 9, 2018, 18:38:09 (Context for Post 2124): An Anonymous user referred to a “Mossad/Clown asshole” using “division tactics” on the boards. Q responded by discussing the resignation of powerful people and the dismantling of human trafficking networks.
Additional Information: In this context, “Clown” is a common Q-slang term for the CIA. By responding to a post that grouped the Mossad and the CIA together, Q reinforced a “Deep State” theory where intelligence agencies act as a shadow government. The mention of “dismantling human trafficking” served to raise the stakes, suggesting that these agencies were involved in global crimes that the military-led “Plan” would eventually expose. - October 4, 2018, 17:27:07 (Post 2337): Q issued a direct command: “Israeli intelligence – stand down.” Q further stated that “[TERM_3720x380-293476669283001] Media assets will be removed.”
Additional Information: This entry represented a shift toward an adversarial tone regarding foreign intelligence operations. By claiming that media assets would be removed, the narrative suggested that Israeli intelligence was attempting to influence U.S. public opinion or digital spaces. It positioned “Q” as an authority capable of monitoring and countering sophisticated foreign espionage. - February 9, 2019, 22:54:04 (Post 2681): Q provided a list of search links for users to “reconcile,” which included a Jerusalem Post article titled “Muslim woman fights for Israel despite death threats.”
Additional Information: This inclusion served to complicate the narrative regarding Middle Eastern politics. By highlighting a story of internal Israeli cooperation across religious lines, Q encouraged followers to “reconcile” mainstream news with the “Plan.” It suggested that the battle was not between nations or religions, but between “patriots” and “bad actors” within every system.
(LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This report is provided for historical and sociological research purposes to analyze the evolution of the Qanon narrative. The information summarizes claims made within the “Q” posts and does not constitute an accusation or validation of these claims. There is no factual evidence provided by these sources to confirm that any specific individual or organization is a “Mossad asset,” “agent,” or involved in the activities described.)
The attitude toward Israel in the Q posts is best described as complex and strategic, rather than a simple positive or negative binary. Depending on the context, the tone shifts significantly to serve different parts of the narrative.
1. Neutral/Geopolitical (The “State” Level)
In several instances, Q treats Israel as a standard geopolitical actor.
• Example: Listing the Bank of Israel among other central banks (Post 138) or referencing Prime Minister Netanyahu’s “Authentic” disclosure about Iran (Post 1307).
• Sentiment: In these cases, the tone is relatively neutral or even supportive of the Trump administration’s alliance with Israel against common adversaries like Iran.
2. Negative/Adversarial (The “Intelligence” Level)
When the focus shifts to the Mossad or intelligence operations, the attitude becomes sharply negative and suspicious.
• Example: Ordering Israeli intelligence to “stand down” (Post 2337) or labeling “patriot” figures like Jerome Corsi as “Mossad assets” to discredit them (Post 2104).
• Sentiment: This frames Israel’s intelligence apparatus as a “bad actor” or a component of the “Deep State” that interferes with the “Plan.”
3. Strategic Ambiguity (The “Saved for Last” Level)
The claim that Israel is being “saved for last” (Post 916) creates a sense of ominous importance.
• Sentiment: This doesn’t take a side but suggests that Israel holds a unique, perhaps controversial, role in the global power structure that is too sensitive to reveal early on. It allows the community to project their own views—whether pro-Israel or anti-Israel—onto the “missing” information.
Written with the help of AI.
Writing by Dr. Dannielle Blumenthal 