SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JANE DOE, Index No.:
Plaintiff,
-against- SUMMONS
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INC., CHI PHI CHAPTER HOUSE
ASSOCIATION, CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., CHI PHI
EDUCATIONAL TRUST, ALPHA BETA HOUSE CORPORATION
OF DELTA DELTA DELTA, DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY,
ZAREEN ENTERPRISE LLC d/b/a MOONIES BAR & NIGHTCLUB,
MATTHEW INGALLS, JOHNATHAN NEWELL, WINSTON LEE,
GILLIO LOPES, DIEGO SARABIA, SCOTT NORRIS, SCOTT
KRETZSCHMAR, JOHN DOE (FACULTY), JOHN DOE (ALUMNI),
JOHN DOES (EXECUTIVE BOARD), and ORAZIO PETITO,
Defendants.
Plaintiff designates NEW YORK County as the place of trial. Venue is based on the location in
which Plaintiff currently resides.
TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve
a copy of your answer, or, if the Complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of
appearance, on the Plaintiffâs Attorney(s) within 20 days after the service of this summons,
exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this summons is
not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in the case of your failure to
appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the
Complaint.
Dated: New York, New York
September 14, 2026
RHEINGOLD GIUFFRA RUFFO
PLOTKIN & HELLMAN LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff _____________________ By: Thomas P. Giuffra, Esq. 551 Fifth Avenue, 29th Fl. New York, NY 10176 Tel: (212) 684-1880 tgiuffra@rheingoldlaw.com 1
COCHRUN & SEALS, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
(Pro Hac Vice pending)
/s/ W. Whitney Seals
By: W. Whitney Seals, Esq.
P.O. Box 10448
Birmingham, AL 35202-0448
Tel: (202) 323-3900
whitney@cochrunseals.com
2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JANE DOE, Index No.:
Plaintiff,
-against- COMPLAINT
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INC., CHI PHI CHAPTER HOUSE
ASSOCIATION, CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., CHI PHI
EDUCATIONAL TRUST, ALPHA BETA HOUSE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS
CORPORATION OF DELTA DELTA DELTA, DELTA DELTA A TRIAL BY JURY
DELTA SORORITY, ZAREEN ENTERPRISE LLC d/b/a
MOONIES BAR & NIGHTCLUB, MATTHEW INGALLS,
JOHNATHAN NEWELL, WINSTON LEE, GILLIO LOPES,
DIEGO SARABIA, SCOTT NORRIS, SCOTT KRETZSCHMAR,
JOHN DOE (FACULTY), JOHN DOE (ALUMNI), JOHN DOES
(EXECUTIVE BOARD), and ORAZIO PETITO,
Defendants. Plaintiff JANE DOE complaining of the Defendants by her attorneys RHEINGOLD
GIUFFRA RUFFO PLOTKIN & HELLMAN LLP, and COCHRUN & SEALS, LLC (Pro Hac
Vice pending), respectfully alleges, upon information and belief, the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This complaint is based on the negligent, willful, or intentional failure of the
Defendants CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INC., CHI PHI CHAPTER HOUSE ASSOCIATION,
CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., CHI PHI EDUCATIONAL TRUST, ALPHA BETA HOUSE
CORPORATION OF DELTA DELTA DELTA, DELTA DELTA DELTA SORORITY, JOHN
DOE (FACULTY), JOHN DOE (ALUMNI), JOHN DOES (EXECUTIVE BOARD), and
ORAZIO PETITO, their employees, agents, and/or servants, to protect Plaintiff JANE DOE from
being sexually assaulted and raped by multiple members of the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity
at Cornell University, while at the Chi Phi Fraternity house on Cornell Universityâs campus, as
well as against those individuals, Defendants MATTHEW INGALLS, JOHNATHAN NEWELL, 3
WINSTON LEE, GILLIO LOPES, DIEGO SARABIA, SCOTT NORRIS, and SCOTT
KRETZSCHMAR, who perpetrated such heinous criminal sexual acts against Plaintiff therein. 2. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendant CORNELL
UNIVERSITY, INC., for breach of contract. 3. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendants ALPHA BETA
HOUSE CORPORATION OF DELTA DELTA DELTA and DELTA DELTA DELTA
SORORITY, for breach of contract. 4. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendant CORNELL
UNIVERSITY, INC., for violations of New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL), Executive
(EXC) Chapter 18, Article 15, Section 296 et seq. 5. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendant CORNELL
UNIVERSITY, INC., for violations of New York Education Law (EDN) § 6440. 6. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendants MATTHEW
INGALLS, JOHNATHAN NEWELL, WINSTON LEE, GILLIO LOPES, DIEGO SARABIA,
SCOTT NORRIS, and SCOTT KRETZSCHMAR, and each of them, for their sexual assault and
rape of Plaintiff, pursuant to the protections afforded by CPLR 213-c. 7. This complaint also contains allegations against Defendant ZAREEN
ENTERPRISE LLC d/b/a MOONIES BAR & NIGHTCLUB, their employees, agents, and/or
servants, for causes of action pursuant to New Yorkâs Dram Shop Act, General Obligations Law
§§11-100 â 11-101, as well as others under the theory of negligence. PARTIES 8. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff JANE DOE (hereinafter âDOEâ) was a 20-year-
old adult female. 4
9. That at all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INC. (hereinafter
âCORNELLâ) was and is a private institution of higher education with address in New York City
and Ithaca, New York. 10. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained, operated and controlled the
private ivy-league university known as Cornell University, with a mailing address of 616 Thurston
Avenue, Ithaca, New York 14853. 11. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student attending
CORNELLâs Cornell University located in Ithaca, New York. 12. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff resided on CORNELLâs campus. 13. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained a private police department
known as Cornell University Police, with its primary office located at 117 Statler Dr, Ithaca, New
York 14853. 14. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained a Division of Public Safety, with
its primary office located at 245 East Hill Office Building, Ithaca, New York 14852. 15. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained the SHARE Office within the
Skorton Center for Health Initiatives located at 410 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca, New York 14850. 16. That at all relevant times, CORNELL held itself out to the public, and more
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to adequately
protect its students and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and policing of its
campus and those utilizing said campus. 17. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was attending and lawfully located on
CORNELLâs campus, of which CORNELL had and has complete control, she was sexually
assaulted and raped by fellow Cornell University students at the fraternity house known as Chi Phi 5
Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 18. That at all relevant times, CORNELL owned, managed, operated, and/or controlled
the subject Chi Phi Fraternity house, as it was and is situated on CORNELLâs property. 19. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI CHAPTER HOUSE ASSOCIATION
(hereinafter âXI CHAPTERâ) was and is a Chapter of the international menâs fraternity (aka
fraternity) known as Chi Phi Fraternity which is managed, owned, and/or controlled by Defendants
CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., and CHI PHI EDUCATIONAL TRUST (hereinafter jointly
referred to as âCHI PHI NATIONALâ), 20. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTERâs Executive Offices are located at 801
Hudson St, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030. 21. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER was and is a domestic not-for-profit
corporation duly organized and existing under New York law with its principal place of business
in Ithaca, New York. 22. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER owned, managed, operated, and/or
controlled the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi at Cornell Universityâs house located at 107 Edgemoor Ln,
Ithaca, New York 14850. 23. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER maintained and controlled a regional
chapter of its parent organization, known as the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity at Cornell
University. 24. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER maintained and controlled a residential
house on Cornell Universityâs campus for the Xi Chapterâs use, located at 107 Edgemoor Ln,
Ithaca, New York 14850. 25. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER held itself out to the public, and more 6
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to adequately
protect its invitees and/or guests and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and
policing of the Xi Chapterâs house and those living in and utilizing said house. 26. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within XI CHAPTERâs
house, of which XI CHAPTER had and has complete control, she was plied with alcohol and drugs
to the point of intoxication by members of XI CHAPTERâs fraternal organization, which resulted
in Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by members of XI CHAPTERâs regional fraternal
organization at Cornell University, operating out of the fraternity house known as Chi Phi
Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 27. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., was and is a domestic
business corporation duly organized and existing under Georgia law with its principal place of
business in Roswell, Georgia. 28. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., owned, managed,
operated, and/or controlled XI CHAPTER, a regional chapter of its fraternal organization,
operating out of the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi at Cornell Universityâs house located at 107 Edgemoor
Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 29. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI EDUCATIONAL TRUST was and is a
domestic not-for-profit corporation duly organized and existing under Georgia law with its
principal place of business in Roswell, Georgia. 30. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI EDUCATIONAL TRUST owned, managed,
operated, and/or controlled XI CHAPTER, a regional chapter of its fraternal organization,
operating out of the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi at Cornell Universityâs house located at 107 Edgemoor
Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 7
31. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI FRATERNITY, INC., and CHI PHI
EDUCATIONAL TRUST operate jointly as one business entity known as Chi Phi Fraternity
(hereinafter jointly referred to as âCHI PHI NATIONALâ), with its Executive Offices located at
885 Woodstock Rd Suite 430-389, Roswell, GA 30075. 32. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI NATIONAL maintained and controlled a
regional chapter of its parent organization, known as the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity at Cornell
University. 33. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI NATIONAL maintained and controlled a
residential house on Cornell Universityâs campus for the Xi Chapterâs use, located at 107
Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 34. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI NATIONAL held itself out to the public, and
more particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to
adequately protect its invitees and/or guests and to use reasonable care and diligence in its
monitoring and policing of the Xi Chapterâs house and those living in and utilizing said house. 35. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within CHI PHI
NATIONALâs house, of which CHI PHI NATIONAL had and has complete control, she was plied
with alcohol and drugs to the point of intoxication by members of CHI PHI NATIONALâs fraternal
organization, which resulted in Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by members of XI CHI
PHI NATIONALâs regional fraternal organization at Cornell University, operating out of the
fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York
14850. 36. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF DELTA
DELTA DELTA (hereinafter âALPHA BETA CHAPTERâ) was and is a Chapter of the 8
international womenâs fraternal organization (aka sorority) known as known as Delta Delta Delta
Sorority, which is managed, owned, and/or controlled by Defendant DELTA DELTA DELTA
SORORITY (hereinafter âTRI-DELTA NATIONALâ). 37. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER was and is a domestic not-
for-profit corporation duly organized and existing under New York law with its principal place of
business in Ithaca, New York. 38. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER owned and operated the
Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri Delta at Cornell Universityâs house located at 118 Triphammer Road,
Ithaca, New York 14580. 39. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER maintained and controlled
the regional chapter of Tri Deltaâs fraternal organization, known as the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri
Delta at Cornell University. 40. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER maintained and controlled a
residential house on Cornell Universityâs campus for the Alpha Beta Chapterâs use, located at 118
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 41. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff was a member of ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs
regional sorority chapter at Cornell University. 42. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff resided in ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs house
on Cornell University campus, located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 43. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER held itself out to the public,
and more particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to
adequately protect its members and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and
policing of the Alpha Beta Chapterâs house and those living in and utilizing said house. 9
44. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was a member of ALPHA BETA
CHAPTER and while Plaintiff was residing in ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs house, of which
ALPHA BETA CHAPTER had and has complete control, Plaintiff had become intoxicated, and
the house mother employed by ALPHA BETA CHAPTER observed Plaintiff in that intoxicated
state and nevertheless took Plaintiff to MOONIES in downtown Ithaca, NY, which resulted in
Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by fellow Cornell University students at the fraternity
house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 45. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL was and is a domestic business
corporation duly organized and existing under Texas law with its principal place of business
located at 14951 Dallas Pkwy #500, Dallas, Texas 75254. 46. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL owned and operated the Alpha
Beta Chapter of Tri Delta at Cornell Universityâs house located at 118 Triphammer Road, Ithaca,
New York 14580. 47. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL maintained and controlled the
regional chapter of Tri Deltaâs fraternal organization, known as the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri
Delta at Cornell University. 48. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL maintained and controlled a
residential house on Cornell Universityâs campus for the Alpha Beta Chapterâs use, located at 118
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 49. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff was a member of TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs
Alpha Beta Chapter at Cornell University. 50. That at all relevant times, Plaintiff resided in TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha
Beta Chapterâs house on Cornell University campus, located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New 10
York 14850. 51. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL held itself out to the public,
and more particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to
adequately protect its members and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and
policing of the Alpha Beta Chapterâs house and those living in and utilizing said house. 52. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was a member of TRI-DELTA
NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapter and while Plaintiff was residing in TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs
Alpha Beta Chapterâs house, of which TRI-DELTA NATIONAL had and has complete control,
Plaintiff had become intoxicated, and the house mother employed by TRI-DELTA NATIONAL
observed Plaintiff in that intoxicated state and nevertheless took Plaintiff to MOONIES in
downtown Ithaca, NY, which resulted in Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by fellow
Cornell University students at the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107
Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 53. That at all relevant times, JOHN DOE (FACULTY) (hereinafter âFACULTYâ)
was and is the designated faculty advisor appointed by CORNELL as the official liaison between
XI CHAPTER and Cornell University. 54. That at all relevant times, FACULTY, as faculty advisor, was and is assigned by
CORNELL to oversee XI CHAPTER, the Cornell University regional chapter of CHI PHI
NATIONALâs international fraternal organization. 55. That at all relevant times, FACULTY, as faculty advisor, was and is a university
employee, employed directly by CORNELL as a professor, lecturer, administrator, and/or other
faculty member. 56. That at all relevant times, CORNELL was and is vicariously liable under respondeat 11
superior for the negligent acts and omissions of FACULTY. 57. That at all relevant times, FACULTY, as faculty advisor, was responsible for
supervising and maintaining in a safe condition XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and its members
thereat, located 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850, situated within the confines of
CORNELLâs university campus, 58. That at all relevant times, FACULTY, as faculty advisor, held themself out to the
public, and more particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of knowledge and
training to adequately protect CORNELLâs students, including Plaintiff herein, and to use
reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and policing of XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house
and those fraternity members living in and utilizing said house. 59. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within XI CHAPTERâs
house, of which FACULTY, as faculty advisor, breached their duty to supervise and maintain XI
CHAPTERâs fraternity house in a safe condition, as Plaintiff was plied with alcohol and drugs to
the point of intoxication by members of XI CHAPTERâs fraternal organization, which resulted in
Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by members of XI CHAPTERâs regional fraternal
organization at Cornell University, operating out of the fraternity house known as Chi Phi
Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 60. That at all relevant times, JOHN DOE (ALUMNI) (hereinafter âALUMNIâ) was
and is the designated alumni advisor appointed by CHI PHI NATIONAL as the official liaison
between XI CHAPTER and CHI PHI NATIONAL. 61. That at all relevant times, ALUMNI, as alumni advisor, was and is assigned by CHI
PHI NATIONAL to oversee XI CHAPTER, the Cornell University regional chapter of CHI PHI
NATIONALâs international fraternal organization. 12
62. That at all relevant times, ALUMNI, as alumni advisor, was acting as an agent
and/or employee of CHI PHI NATIONAL. 63. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI NATIONAL was and is vicariously liable under
respondeat superior for the negligent acts and omissions of ALUMNI. 64. That at all relevant times, ALUMNI, as alumni advisor, was responsible for
supervising and maintaining in a safe condition XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and its members
thereat, located 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850, situated within the confines of
CORNELLâs university campus. 65. That at all relevant times, ALUMNI, as alumni advisor, held themself out to the
public, and more particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of knowledge and
training to adequately protect CORNELLâs students, including Plaintiff herein, and to use
reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and policing of XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house
and those fraternity members living in and utilizing said house. 66. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within XI CHAPTERâs
house, of which ALUMNI, as alumni advisor, breached their duty to supervise and maintain XI
CHAPTERâs fraternity house in a safe condition, as Plaintiff was plied with alcohol and drugs to
the point of intoxication by members of XI CHAPTERâs fraternal organization, which resulted in
Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by members of XI CHAPTER, CHI PHI
NATIONALâs regional fraternal organization at Cornell University, operating out of the fraternity
house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 67. That at all relevant times, JOHN DOES (EXEC) (hereinafter jointly âEXECâ) was
and is the cumulative Executive Board of XI CHAPTER, the regional chapter of CHI PHI
NATIONAL upon CORNELLâs university campus, operating out of the fraternity house known 13
as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 68. That at all relevant times, EXEC was and is comprised of a group of elected XI
CHAPTER members who run the day-to-day operations of the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity,
the regional chapter of CHI PHI NATIONAL upon CORNELLâs university campus, operating out
of the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York
14850. 69. That at all relevant times, EXEC was and is comprised of officers with titles such
as: President, Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary, Risk Manager, Recruitment Chair, Social
Chair, among other executive titles. 70. That at all relevant times, EXEC was and is subject to CHI PHI NATIONALâs
constitution and bylaws as well as XI CHAPTERâs regional constitution and bylaws. 71. That at all relevant times, EXEC was and is subject to CORNELLâs constitution,
bylaws, code of conduct, and student organizational rules and regulations. 72. That at all relevant times, EXEC was responsible for supervising and maintaining
in a safe condition, XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and its members thereat, located 118
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850, situated within the confines of CORNELLâs university
campus, 73. That at all relevant times, EXEC held themself out to the public, and more
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of knowledge and training to
adequately protect CORNELLâs students, including Plaintiff herein, and to use reasonable care
and diligence in its monitoring and policing of XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and those
fraternity members living in and utilizing said house. 74. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within XI CHAPTERâs 14
house, of which EXEC breached their duty to supervise and maintain XI CHAPTERâs fraternity
house in a safe condition, as Plaintiff was plied with alcohol and drugs to the point of intoxication
by members of XI CHAPTERâs fraternal organization, which resulted in Plaintiff being sexually
assaulted and raped by members of XI CHAPTERâs regional fraternal organization at Cornell
University, operating out of the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107
Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 75. That at all relevant times, ORAZIO PETITO (hereinafter âPETITOâ) was and is
the elected President of the Executive Board of XI CHAPTER, the regional chapter of CHI PHI
NATIONAL upon CORNELLâs university campus, operating out of the fraternity house known
as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 76. That at all relevant times, PETITO was and is a CORNELL student, as well as a
member of XI CHAPTER, the regional chapter of the greater CHI PHI NATIONAL. 77. That at all relevant times, PETITO was and is subject to CHI PHI NATIONALâs
constitution and bylaws as well as XI CHAPTERâs regional constitution and bylaws. 78. That at all relevant times, PETITO was and is subject to CORNELLâs constitution,
bylaws, code of conduct, and student organizational rules and regulations. 79. That at all relevant times, PETITO was responsible for supervising and maintaining
in a safe condition, XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and its members thereat, located 118
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850, situated within the confines of CORNELLâs university
campus, 80. That at all relevant times, PETITO held himself out to the public, and more
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of knowledge and training to
adequately protect CORNELLâs students, including Plaintiff herein, and to use reasonable care 15
and diligence in its monitoring and policing of XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house and those
fraternity members living in and utilizing said house. 81. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within XI CHAPTERâs
house, of which PETITO breached his duty to supervise and maintain XI CHAPTERâs fraternity
house in a safe condition, as Plaintiff was plied with alcohol and drugs to the point of intoxication
by members of XI CHAPTERâs fraternal organization, which resulted in Plaintiff being sexually
assaulted and raped by members of XI CHAPTERâs regional fraternal organization at Cornell
University, operating out of the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107
Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 82. That at all relevant times, Defendant ZAREEN ENTERPRISE LLC d/b/a
MOONIES BAR & NIGHTCLUB (hereinafter âMOONIESâ) was and is a domestic limited
liability company with its principal address located at 409 Eddy Street, Ithaca, New York, 14850. 83. That at all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES maintained, controlled, and
operated Moonies Bar & Nightclub located at 114 E State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. 84. That at all relevant times, MOONIES maintained a liquor license for Moonies Bar
& Nightclub, where MOONIES, its employees, servants and agents, served invitees and/or guests
with alcoholic beverages. 85. That at all relevant times, MOONIES held itself out to the public, and more
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to adequately
protect its invitees and/or guests and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and
policing of Moonies Bar & Nightclub and those utilizing the premises thereat. 86. That at all relevant times, while Plaintiff was lawfully within MOONIES bar, of
which MOONIES had and has complete control, Plaintiff, as a minor under 21 years old, was 16
served with alcohol to the point of visible intoxication by members of MOONIESâs staff, which
resulted in Plaintiff being sexually assaulted and raped by members of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University, at the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity located at 107 Edgemoor
Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 87. That at all relevant times, Defendant MATTHEW INGALLS (hereinafter
âINGALLSâ) was and is an adult male. 88. That at all relevant times, INGALLS was a full-time undergraduate student
attending Cornell University. 89. That at all relevant times, INGALLS was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University. 90. That at all relevant times, Defendant JOHNATHAN NEWELL (hereinafter
âNEWELLâ) was and is an adult male. 91. That at all relevant times, NEWELL was a full-time undergraduate student
attending Cornell University. 92. That at all relevant times, NEWELL was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University. 93. That at all relevant times, Defendant WINSTON LEE (hereinafter âLEEâ) was and
is an adult male. 94. That at all relevant times, LEE was a full-time undergraduate student attending
Cornell University. 95. That at all relevant times, LEE was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at Cornell
University. 96. That at all relevant times, Defendant GILLIO LOPES (hereinafter âLOPESâ) was 17
and is an adult male. 97. That at all relevant times, LOPES was a full-time undergraduate student attending
Cornell University. 98. That at all relevant times, LOPES was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University. 99. That at all relevant times, Defendant DIEGO SARABIA (hereinafter âSARABIAâ)
was and is an adult male. 100. That at all relevant times, SARABIA was a full-time undergraduate student
attending Cornell University. 101. That at all relevant times, SARABIA was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University. 102. That at all relevant times, Defendant SCOTT NORRIS (hereinafter âNORRISâ)
was and is an adult male. 103. That at all relevant times, NORRIS was a full-time undergraduate student attending
Cornell University. 104. That at all relevant times, NORRIS was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at
Cornell University. 105. That at all relevant times, Defendant SCOTT KRETZSCHMAR (hereinafter
âKRETZSCHMARâ) was and is an adult male. 106. That at all relevant times, KRETZSCHMAR was a full-time undergraduate student
attending Cornell University. 107. That at all relevant times, KRETZSCHMAR was a member of CHI PHIâs Xi
Chapter at Cornell University. 18
108. Plaintiff JANE DOE seeks damages from all Defendants for their actions and more
specifically seeks damages from Defendants CORNELL, XI CHAPTER, CHI PHI NATIONAL,
ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, FACULTY, ALUMNI, EXEC, and
ORAZIO PETITO, who were and are legally responsible for the acts complained of herein that
were committed by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR, and failed to properly supervise and/or monitor the activities of Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 109. Venue is proper because Plaintiff JANE DOE currently resides in the State and
County of New York. 110. Venue is proper because Defendant CORNELL is a private institution of higher
education located in and authorized to transact business in New York with office located in New
York County as well as Tompkins County, New York. 111. Venue is proper because Defendant XI CHAPTER is a domestic not-for-profit
corporation located in and authorized to transact business in New York with its principal office
located in Tompkins County, New York. 112. Venue is proper because Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL is a domestic not-for-
profit corporation located in and authorized to transact business in New York with a regional
subsidiary known as the Xi Chapter, located in Tompkins County, New York. 113. Venue is proper because Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER is a domestic not-
for-profit corporation located in and authorized to transact business in New York with its principal
office located in Tompkins County, New York. 114. Venue is proper because Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL is a domestic not- 19
for-profit corporation located in and authorized to transact business in New York with a regional
subsidiary known as the Alpha Beta Chapter, located in Tompkins County, New York. 115. Venue is proper because Defendant MOONIES is a domestic limited liability
company located in and authorized to transact business in New York with its principal office
located in Tompkins County, New York. 116. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limit of all lower
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. FOREWORD 117. In August 2022, Plaintiff was 18 years old when she flew across the country from
her family home to begin her studies at Cornell University (the âUniversityâ), with similar hopes,
expectations and trepidations of other high school graduates embarking on something so seemingly
monumental. She arrived on a campus where the University actively promoted Greek membership
as a âvitalâ part of the campus community and endorsed these organizations as well- managed,
worthy pathways to new friendships and improving oneâs educational and professional
opportunities. Large fraternity and sorority houses were in prominent locations on campus. 118. Before and when Plaintiff set foot on campus, she never knew that the University
had been the scene of numerous incidents of sexual assault and rape in the months and years prior
to her arrival. Students were afraid, protesting, and demanding reforms. 119. By this time, the University had established campus organizations to address these
prevailing issues, such as the SHARE (âSexual Harassment & AssaultâResponse & Educationâ)
Office, implementing anti-sexual violence training in the Universityâs Greek houses, advising
incoming students about the risks of sexual assault and harassment in college, and offering support
services to victims/survivors. 20
120. These reforms took place after Resolution 34 was passed in on March 19, 2021,
requesting that âCornell University review policies and action items over fraternity system,
including reform, disband or abolishâ and have the âOffice of Sorority and Fraternity Life to
perform a yearly review of all fraternities and any fraternity accused of sexual harassment will be
placed on probation or have its recognition revoked.â 121. Even still, in the following Fall 2022 semester, Cornell University saw at least 5
reported cases of drugging and 2 reports of sexual assault on Cornellâs campus, all of which
occurred at fraternity addresses. This triggered a response from the Cornell University Student
Assembly who presented Resolution 16: Condemning Greek Life on December 1, 2022. 122. Plaintiff also never knew that the dangers of fraternities were so widespread in the
decade before her arrival that they had been ranked as the âsixth worst risk for insurance companies
â just behind hazardous waste disposal companies and asbestos contractors.â So dangerous were
their activities that their commercial insurance carriers declined insuring them any further. 123. National fraternities and sororities and their executives knew that fraternity
chapters and members were incapable of responsibly managing the provision, use and misuse of
alcohol and drugs in fraternity houses, during recruiting, and at Greek-sponsored events. One
fraternity executive and industry leader confirmed that 99% of insurance claims were related to
the misuse of alcohol. Fraternity recruiting events with alcohol would eventually be labeled by
another fraternity executive and industry leader as being the âdeadliest nights.â 124. Further, Plaintiff was also unaware that a President of Psi Upsilon at Cornell
University, Wolfgang Ballinger, was charged with first-degree attempted rape, first-degree
criminal sex act with a helpless victim, and sexual misconduct after raping a female student at his
fraternity residence in 2016. 21
125. Furthermore, in November 2022, Cornellâs campus police issued alerts that a
female student was sexually assaulted and at least four other students were drugged at off-campus
fraternity parties.1 126. During this period, a loose coalition of student activists began a movement known
as the Ban Greek Life or Abolish Greek Life Movement which gained significant momentum in
2020 and continues to present. 127. However, despite the Abolish Greek Life Movement and all the bad press that
fraternities and sororities had been receiving in the media since the early 2000s, upon her arrival
at Cornell, Plaintiff immediately encountered a glorified â yet materially false and misleading â
façade of Cornell University Greek life. 128. ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, a regional member of TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs
national sorority, established at Cornell University in 1913, operated and recruited new members
and revenue through its Alpha Beta Chapter, which was housed in a stately, all-brick mansion
situated in a prominent location on campus. 129. The University provided its facilities, staff and resources to schedule and organize
ârush,â which encouraged students to join these organizations after reviewing and relying upon
the promotional information it and the Greek organizations provided. 130. Plaintiff followed the pathway, applied for, and accepted a bid to pledge TRI-
DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapter. ALPHA BETA CHAPTER quickly became her first
choice after rush began. She was drawn to the sorority and its promises of sisterhood and lifelong
friendships, the status it conferred on its members, and the community it provided on campus when
she was over 1,000 miles away from home. By this date, TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs leadership
1
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/07/nyregion/cornell-fraternities-sexual-assault.html 22
had banned the presence and use of alcohol and drugs in its chapter houses, presumably based
upon its knowledge that its mismanagement had resulted in numerous incidents of rapes and other
injuries. FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION 131. Plaintiff JANE DOE repeats and re-alleges the above allegations. 132. That the occurrence complained of herein took place within CHI PHI
NATIONALâs Xi Chapterâs fraternity house, located upon CORNELLâs campus, at the address
107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850, where Plaintiff was drugged and raped by multiple
members of CHI PHI NATIONALâs fraternal organization. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was
attending CORNELL as a full-time undergraduate student and was residing on CORNELLâs
campus within TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapter sorority house, located at 118
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 133. On the evening of October 19, 2024, into the morning of October 20, 2024, Plaintiff
DOE was the victim of one or more criminal sex acts at the hands of Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR (hereinafter âStudent
Defendantsâ). 134. Plaintiff DOE was in a very vulnerable situation when she was sexually assaulted
by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR, of which the Student Defendants were fully aware. 135. On October 19, 2024, TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapter was hosting
a social event at Moonies Bar & Nightclub located at 114 E State St, Ithaca, NY 14850. 136. On October 19, 2024, prior to the event at Moonies, Plaintiff consumed Titoâs
vodka within TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapterâs sorority house located at 118 23
Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850, until she was intoxicated. 137. Thereafter, around 8:30 PM, Plaintiff took an Uber from ALPHA BETA
CHAPTERâs sorority house on CORNELLâs campus to Moonies Bar & Nightclub, accompanied
by the Chapterâs Sorority House Mother, âJadeâ. 138. When Plaintiff arrived at Moonies, around 9 PM, the bouncer placed an âXâ on
each of her hands, to signify she was under 21 years old. 139. Despite having underage marks on her hands, Plaintiff was served and consumed
at least one alcoholic beverage at Moonies. 140. Within Moonies, TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs Alpha Beta Chapter had designated
sober monitors, tasked with ensuring the safety and well-being of attendees and monitoring their
fellow sorority sisters for signs of excessive intoxication and/or disruptive behavior. 141. Around 10 PM, Plaintiff and other sorority sisters left the event at Moonies and
walked to another bar nearby known as Lot 10 Bar and Lounge, located at 106 S Cayuga St, Ithaca,
NY 14850. 142. At Lot 10, Plaintiff was given an âunder 21â wristband. 143. Around 11 PM, Plaintiff decided to leave Lot 10 and stumbled alone to CHI PHI
NATIONALâs Xi Chapter fraternity house on CORNELLâs campus, located at 107 Edgemoor Ln,
Ithaca, New York 14850, to hang out with her friend, Defendant INGALLS. 144. When Plaintiff arrived at XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house, Plaintiff was visibly
intoxicated as she had consumed about 10 standard drinks within the past 3 hours. 145. Plaintiff was let into XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house by three or four members of
the fraternity who had been standing by the front door. 146. Therein, Plaintiff saw Defendant INGALLS, who greeted Plaintiff and gave her a 24
beer. 147. Plaintiff and Defendant INGALLS then danced together in the main room of the
fraternity house. 148. After dancing, Defendant INGALLS pulled Plaintiff off to a quieter area and
propositioned her with having a threesome with her and another one of his fraternity brothers. 149. In her drunken state, Plaintiff was incapable of consenting to this proposition. 150. Despite being incapable of consent, Defendant INGALLS then led Plaintiff to the
upstairs of the fraternity house and left her with Alex Vega, another XI CHAPTER member. 151. After speaking with Alex for some time, Defendant INGALLS returned and led
Plaintiff to another room down the hall, where Defendant NEWELL was sitting on a couch. 152. While on the couch, Defendant INGALLS and NEWELL began passing around a
plastic bag containing a white, powdery substance claimed to be Ketamine, a dissociative
anesthetic with hallucinogenic properties. 153. Defendants INGALLS and NEWELL then pressured Plaintiff into snorting the
alleged Ketamine with them, a drug she had never done before. 154. During this time, Defendant INGALLS and NEWELL also plied Plaintiff with
marijuana and âJamaican Liquorâ believed to be some type of high-proof rum. 155. Soon after, Defendant INGALLS and NEWELL began engaging in sexual acts with
Plaintiff, all without her consent. 156. During the assault, Defendant INGALLS forced oral sex on Plaintiff while
Defendant NEWELL forced vaginal intercourse on her from behind. 157. Throughout the assault, Defendant NEWELL slapped Plaintiff on the buttocks
multiple times, resulting in bruising. 25
158. At one point, Defendant INGALLS could no longer maintain an erection, so he
stopped participating and told the other two that he was going to take a nap and proceeded to get
up, move to a bed, and sleep. 159. Defendant NEWELL then began reaching for her vagina with his hand multiple
times, and each time, Plaintiff pushed his hand away. 160. Soon after, Defendant LOPES entered the room, grabbed Plaintiff away from
Defendant NEWELL, and began kissing her, while Defendant NEWELL groped her from behind,
specifically reaching for her vagina. 161. Defendant LOPES and NEWELL then placed Plaintiff on a bed and the two men
began having sex with Plaintiff, initiating another assault, all without Plaintiffâs consent. 162. At approximately 1:42 AM, Defendant NEWELL sent a message into the XI
CHAPTERâs member Snapchat group entitled âChi Phi Activesâ, in which the active fraternity
members are present, claiming there was âfree pussyâ upstairs, referring to Plaintiff thereat. 26
âChi Phi Activesâ Snapchat Group (October 20, 2024, at 1:42 AM) 27
163. In doing so, Defendant NEWELL organized and encouraged other XI CHAPTER
members to join in on the gang rape of Plaintiff in the XI CHAPTER fraternity house. 164. At this point, multiple other members of XI CHAPTER entered the room and
Plaintiff retreated under the covers of the bed, to hide her naked body from the fraternity men. 165. Soon after, Defendant SARABIA approached Plaintiff, grabbed her face and started
kissing her, all without her consent, and Plaintiff pushed him away. 166. At that point, Plaintiffâs phone was on the other side of the room and she felt as if
there was no way for her to escape this room full of predatory, fraternity men. 167. Defendant NEWELL then poured a line of Ketamine onto his erect penis and
commanded that Plaintiff snort it, which she did. 168. Defendant NEWELL then got in the bed with Plaintiff and began groping her and
reaching for her vagina, again. 169. While Plaintiff was lying on her back on the bed, Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, then began pouring lines
of Ketamine all over her body and snorting them. 170. Eventually, Defendants NEWELL, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR, decided to exit this room and Plaintiff was removed by Defendantâs INGALLS
and LEE to another, smaller room, believed to be the Fraternity Presidentâs Office. 171. Once inside, Defendants INGALLS and LEE made more lines of Ketamine and
instructed Plaintiff to snort one, which she did. 172. By this point, Plaintiff was completely incapacitated. 173. Thereafter, Defendant INGALLS and LEE initiated another assault of Plaintiff,
forcing oral and vaginal sex upon her simultaneously. 28
174. At around 5:45 AM, this assault concluded and Plaintiff lost consciousness. 175. When Plaintiff awoke later that day, on October 20, 2024, Plaintiff returned to her
residence within the ALPHA BETA CHAPTER sorority house. 176. At this point, Plaintiff was in a state of shock. 177. At her residence, Plaintiff noticed a large bruise that had formed on her buttocks
and took preemptive medication for a urinary tract infection (UTI). 178. Later that day, Plaintiff became aware that what had happened to her at the XI
CHAPTER house the previous night was becoming public knowledge on CORNELLâs campus. 179. With the encouragement of her friends, on or about November 8, 2024, Plaintiff
reported the incident to CORNELLâs private police force known as Cornell University Police
Department located at 117 Statler Drive G2 Barton Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853. 180. On or about November 8, 2024, XI CHAPTER was placed on a temporary
suspension for alleged violations of the Student Code of Conduct. 181. On or about November 8, 2024, temporary suspensions were also issued for several
students, including Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR, who were afforded the opportunity to mitigate their conduct by submitting
essays to CORNELL. 182. On November 26, 2024, CORNELL released a University Statement entitled
âUpdate on disturbing allegations of sexual violenceâ, providing an update on its ongoing
investigation into the âserious and deeply disturbing allegations of drug abuse and sexual violence
at the Chi Phi fraternity houseâ 2 as further described in this Complaint. 183. On or about January 14, 2025, CORNELL commenced a Title IX investigation in
2
https://statements.cornell.edu/2024/20241126-update.cfm 29
response to Plaintiffâs Formal Complaint, filed with CORNELLâs Title IX Coordinator. 184. From May 2, 2025, up and through May 29, 2025, CORNELLâs Title IX Office
conducted numerous (at least twelve) hearings regarding Plaintiffâs allegations herein. 185. On November 4, 2025, CORNELL released a University Statement entitled â2025
Cornell Survey of Sexual Assault and Related Misconduct resultsâ noting an increased prevalence
of sexual misconduct on its campus, among other troubling results.3 186. Upon information and belief, CORNELLâs Title IX investigation is concluded. 187. Upon information and belief, the matter is also still being investigated by the Ithaca
Police Department. 188. At all times relevant, not only did Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR violate applicable law, but also violated the terms
outlined in the Cornell Student Code of Conduct (effective August 2, 2021). 189. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL managed,
maintained, supervised, operated, and controlled the facilities, locations, and equipment that
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
used to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 190. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL hired, managed, supervised, and
controlled the officers, managers, supervisors, administrators, and staff that worked and/or
volunteered at its facilities and locations, where Plaintiff was sexually assaulted and raped by
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR 191. At all relevant times Defendant CORNELL held itself out to the public as the owner
of its facilities and locations, including the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house, where Plaintiff was
3
https://statements.cornell.edu/2025/20251104-sarm-survey.cfm 30
sexually assaulted and raped by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 192. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL held out its agents, servants, and
employees to the public as those who managed, maintained, supervised, operated, and controlled
its facilities and locations, including the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house, where Plaintiff was
sexually assaulted and raped by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 193. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was in the care, custody, and control of Defendant
CORNELL when she was sexually abused by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, while she was using its facilities, locations, and
equipment, and more specifically, while Plaintiff was within the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house
on CORNELLâs campus. 194. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL failed to prevent and/or allowed the
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
to sexually assault and rape Plaintiff. 195. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL failed to prevent and/or allowed
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
to sexually abuse Plaintiff using property that was owned, operated, and/or controlled by
Defendant CORNELL including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 196. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL knew or should have known that its
negligent conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress, as well as personal
physical injury, on others, including Plaintiff, and she did in fact suffer severe emotional and
psychological distress and personal physical injury because of its wrongful conduct. 31
197. Upon information and belief, at all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL
managed, maintained, supervised, operated, and controlled the facilities, locations, and equipment
that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR used to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 198. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL hired, managed, supervised,
and controlled the officers, managers, supervisors, administrators, and staff that worked and/or
volunteered at its facilities and locations, where Plaintiff was sexually assaulted and raped by
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 199. At all relevant times Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL held itself out to the public
as the owner of its facilities and locations, including the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house, where
Plaintiff was sexually assaulted and raped by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 200. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL held out its agents, servants,
and employees to the public as those who managed, maintained, supervised, operated, and
controlled its facilities and locations, including the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house, where
Plaintiff was sexually assaulted and raped by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 201. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was in the care, custody, and control of Defendant
CHI PHI NATIONAL when she was sexually abused by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE,
LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, while she was using its facilities, locations,
and equipment, and more specifically, while Plaintiff was within the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity
house on CORNELLâs campus. 202. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL failed to prevent and/or 32
allowed Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR to sexually assault and rape Plaintiff. 203. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL failed to prevent and/or
allowed Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR to sexually abuse Plaintiff using property that was owned, operated, and/or
controlled by Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 204. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL knew or should have known
that its negligent conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress, as well as
personal physical injury, on others, including Plaintiff, and she did in fact suffer severe emotional
and psychological distress and personal physical injury because of its wrongful conduct. 205. By reason of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendants CORNELL, CHI PHI
NATIONAL, XI CHAPTER, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, TRI-DELTA-NATIONAL,
MOONIES, FACULTY, ALUMNI, EXEC, PETITO, and all Student Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR as detailed herein,
Plaintiff DOE sustained injuries, including but not limited to, severe emotional and psychological
distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous
system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional and psychological damage. 206. Upon information and belief, some or all of these injuries are of a permanent and
lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to expend sums of money for
treatment. AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: NEGLIGENCE 207. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 33
208. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was
utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 209. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 210. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using its tasks, premises, and instrumentalities
to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 211. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL breached the foregoing duties by
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE,
LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises,
and instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their
behavior; failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house located on its
campus; and, in failing to warn Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, 34
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might
sexually abuse her. 212. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
CORNELL, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 213. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
CORNELL, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 214. At all relevant times, Defendant XI CHAPTER had a duty to take reasonable steps
to protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was
utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 215. At all relevant times, Defendant XI CHAPTER breached the foregoing duty by
failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 216. At all relevant times, Defendant XI CHAPTER breached the foregoing duty by
failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, 35
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using its tasks, premises, and instrumentalities
to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 217. At all relevant times, Defendant XI CHAPTER breached the foregoing duties by
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, including
recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control,
including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to warn
Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 218. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
XI CHAPTER, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 219. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
XI CHAPTER, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not
limited to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 36
220. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL had a duty to take
reasonable steps to protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care,
custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant
CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 221. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached the foregoing duty
by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 222. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached the foregoing duty
by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using its tasks, premises, and instrumentalities
to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 223. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached the foregoing
duties by failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL,
LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks,
premises, and instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about
their behavior; failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and 37
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 224. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
CHI PHI NATIONAL, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS,
and KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 225. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
CHI PHI NATIONAL, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but
not limited to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 226. At all relevant times, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER had a duty to take
reasonable steps to protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care,
custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant
CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment, including the ALPHA BETA
CHAPTERâs sorority house on CORNELLâs campus and its social event held at Moonies Bar &
Nightclub. 227. At all relevant times, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER breached the foregoing
duty by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Plaintiff from binge drinking at its sorority
house on CORNELLâs campus, when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control, and was
utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment, including the ALPHA BETA CHAPTER sorority
house on CORNELLâs campus and its social event held at Moonies Bar & Nightclub. 228. At all relevant times, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER breached the foregoing 38
duty by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent underage members from binge drinking at
its sorority house and its social events. 229. At all relevant times, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER breached the foregoing
duties by failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff when she was using its tasks,
premises, and instrumentalities, including failing to adequately train its designated sober monitors;
failing to adequately train its designated House Mother; failing to investigate complaints and
concerns about member behavior; failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and
employees to supervise Plaintiff, including recognizing signs that she was intoxicated and drinking
alcohol under the age of 21-years-old; failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff
while she was in its care, custody, and control, including the ongoing activities at the ALPHA
BETA CHAPTER sorority house located on its campus; and, in failing to warn Plaintiff that she
might be sexually abused by other Greek Life members. 230. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 231. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries,
including but not limited to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright,
dissociation, anger, depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and
mental anguish, and emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some
or all of these injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become
obligated to expend sums of money for treatment. 232. At all relevant times, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL had a duty to take 39
reasonable steps to protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care,
custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant
CORNELL and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment, including the ALPHA BETA
CHAPTERâs sorority house on CORNELLâs campus and its social event held at Moonies Bar &
Nightclub. 233. At all relevant times, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL breached the foregoing
duty by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent Plaintiff from binge drinking at its sorority
house on CORNELLâs campus, when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control, and was
utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment, including the ALPHA BETA CHAPTER sorority
house on CORNELLâs campus and its social event held at Moonies Bar & Nightclub. 234. At all relevant times, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL breached the foregoing
duty by failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent underage members from binge drinking at
its sorority house and its social events. 235. At all relevant times, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL breached the foregoing
duties by failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff when she was using its tasks,
premises, and instrumentalities, including failing to adequately train its designated sober monitors;
failing to adequately train its designated House Mother; failing to investigate complaints and
concerns about member behavior; failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and
employees to supervise Plaintiff, including recognizing signs that she was intoxicated and drinking
alcohol under the age of 21-years-old; failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff
while she was in its care, custody, and control, including the ongoing activities at the ALPHA
BETA CHAPTER sorority house located on its campus; and, in failing to warn Plaintiff that she
might be sexually abused by other Greek Life members. 40
236. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 237. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including
but not limited to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation,
anger, depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish,
and emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 238. That at all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES maintained, controlled, and
operated Moonies Bar & Nightclub located at 114 E State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. 239. At all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a guest and/or invitee upon its premises known as Moonies Bar &
Nightclub, and was utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 240. At all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care in its care, custody, and control of Moonies Bar & Nightclub as well
as those utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment, including Plaintiff threat. 241. At all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES breached the foregoing duties by
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff when she was using its tasks, premises,
and instrumentalities, including failing to monitor its bartenders and/or servers; failing to
investigate concerns about overpouring; failing to investigate concerns about serving minors; 41
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Plaintiff,
including recognizing signs that Plaintiff was underaged and that she was intoxicated; failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control,
including the ongoing activities at Moonies Bar & Nightclub; and, in failing to warn Plaintiff about
the dangers of being at Moonies Bar & Nightclub. 242. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
MOONIES, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 243. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
MOONIES, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 244. At all relevant times, Defendant FACULTY had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 245. At all relevant times, Defendant FACULTY breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of 42
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 246. At all relevant times, Defendant FACULTY breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 247. At all relevant times, Defendant FACULTY breached the foregoing duties by
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, including
recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control,
including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house; and, in failing to warn
Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 248. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
FACULTY, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 249. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
FACULTY, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and 43
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 250. At all relevant times, Defendant ALUMNI had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 251. At all relevant times, Defendant ALUMNI breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 252. At all relevant times, Defendant ALUMNI breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 253. At all relevant times, Defendant ALUMNI breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, including
recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; failing to 44
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control,
including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house; and, in failing to warn
Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 254. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
ALUMNI, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 255. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
ALUMNI, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 256. At all relevant times, Defendant EXEC had a duty to take reasonable steps to protect
Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control, including
when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing
XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 257. At all relevant times, Defendant EXEC breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was in its care,
custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant
CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 45
258. At all relevant times, Defendant EXEC breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 259. At all relevant times, Defendant EXEC breached the foregoing duties by failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, including
recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control,
including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house; and, in failing to warn
Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 260. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
EXEC, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 261. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
EXEC, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited to,
severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression,
anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional
and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these injuries are of a 46
permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to expend sums of
money for treatment. 262. At all relevant times, Defendant PETITO had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was
utilizing its facilities, locations, and equipment. 263. At all relevant times, Defendant PETITO breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was in its care,
custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of Defendant
CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 264. At all relevant times, Defendant PETITO breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using its tasks, premises, and instrumentalities to sexually
abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 265. At all relevant times, Defendant PETITO breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using its tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
failing to exercise reasonable care in training its agents and employees to supervise Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, including
recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in its care, custody, and control, 47
including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to warn
Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 266. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
PETITO, Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 267. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
PETITO, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 268. At all relevant times, Defendant INGALLS had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 269. At all relevant times, Defendant INGALLS breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 270. At all relevant times, Defendant INGALLS breached the foregoing duty by failing 48
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 271. At all relevant times, Defendant INGALLS breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 272. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
INGALLS, Defendants NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 273. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
INGALLS, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 274. At all relevant times, Defendant NEWELL had a duty to take reasonable steps to 49
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 275. At all relevant times, Defendant NEWELL breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants INGALLS, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 276. At all relevant times, Defendant NEWELL breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants INGALLS, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 277. At all relevant times, Defendant NEWELL breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants INGALLS, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants INGALLS, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 278. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
NEWELL, Defendants INGALLS, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR 50
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 279. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
NEWELL, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 280. At all relevant times, Defendant LEE had a duty to take reasonable steps to protect
Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 281. At all relevant times, Defendant LEE breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS,
LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when
Plaintiff was in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time
undergraduate student of Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities,
locations, and equipment. 282. At all relevant times, Defendant LEE breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS,
LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks,
premises, and instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and
equipment. 51
283. At all relevant times, Defendant LEE breached the foregoing duties by failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 284. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
LEE, Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 285. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
LEE, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited to,
severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression,
anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional
and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these injuries are of a
permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to expend sums of
money for treatment. 286. At all relevant times, Defendant LOPES had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 52
287. At all relevant times, Defendant LEE breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was
in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 288. At all relevant times, Defendant LOPES breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 289. At all relevant times, Defendant LOPES breached the foregoing duties by failing to
exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 290. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
LOPES, Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 291. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
LOPES, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited to, 53
severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression,
anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional
and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these injuries are of a
permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to expend sums of
money for treatment. 292. At all relevant times, Defendant SARABIA had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 293. At all relevant times, Defendant SARABIA breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
LOPES, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was in
its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 294. At all relevant times, Defendant SARABIA breached the foregoing duty by failing
to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
LOPES, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 295. At all relevant times, Defendant SARABIA breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, LOPES,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students; 54
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, LOPES, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 296. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
SARABIA, Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, LOPES, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 297. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
LOPES, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited to,
severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger, depression,
anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and emotional
and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these injuries are of a
permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to expend sums of
money for treatment. 298. At all relevant times, Defendant NORRIS had a duty to take reasonable steps to
protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and control,
including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and was
utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 299. At all relevant times, Defendant NORRIS breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
SARABIA, LOPES, and KRETZSCHMAR from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff was in
its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student of
Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and equipment. 55
300. At all relevant times, Defendant NORRIS breached the foregoing duty by failing to
exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
SARABIA, LOPES, and KRETZSCHMAR from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 301. At all relevant times, Defendant NORRIS breached the foregoing duties by failing
to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA,
LOPES, and KRETZSCHMAR when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, LOPES, and
KRETZSCHMAR may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 302. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
NORRIS, Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, LOPES, and KRETZSCHMAR
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 303. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
NORRIS, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not limited
to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 56
304. At all relevant times, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR had a duty to take reasonable
steps to protect Plaintiff DOE from foreseeable harm when Plaintiff was in his care, custody, and
control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student at Cornell University and
was utilizing XI CHAPTERâs facilities, locations, and equipment. 305. At all relevant times, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR breached the foregoing duty by
failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL,
INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and LOPES from sexually abusing Plaintiff when Plaintiff
was in its care, custody, and control, including when Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate
student of Defendant CORNELL and was utilizing XI CHAPTERâS facilities, locations, and
equipment. 306. At all relevant times, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR breached the foregoing duty by
failing to exercise reasonable care to prevent himself, along with Defendants NEWELL,
INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and LOPES from using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises,
and instrumentalities to sexually abuse Plaintiff, including its facilities, locations, and equipment. 307. At all relevant times, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR breached the foregoing duties
by failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and LOPES when they were using XI CHAPTERâs tasks, premises, and
instrumentalities, including failing to investigate complaints and concerns about their behavior;
including recognizing signs that they were using their positions to sexually abuse fellow students;
failing to exercise reasonable care in supervising Plaintiff while she was in his care, custody, and
control, including the ongoing activities at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house; and, in failing to
warn Plaintiff that Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and LOPES
may pose a danger to Plaintiff in that they might sexually abuse her. 57
308. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
KRETZSCHMAR, Defendants NEWELL, INGALLS, LEE, SARABIA, NORRIS, and LOPES
were able to use their positions to sexually abuse Plaintiff. 309. As a direct and proximate result of the wrongful acts and omissions of Defendant
KRETZSCHMAR, Plaintiff DOE sustained physical and psychological injuries, including but not
limited to, severe emotional and psychological distress, humiliation, fright, dissociation, anger,
depression, anxiety, a severe shock to her nervous system, physical pain and mental anguish, and
emotional and psychological damage, and, upon information and belief, some or all of these
injuries are of a permanent and lasting nature, and Plaintiff has and/or will become obligated to
expend sums of money for treatment. 310. The amount of damages sought exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts
which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: NEGLIGENT RETENTION, SUPERVISION, AND/OR DIRECTION 311. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 312. The abuse of Plaintiff JANE DOE occurred on the night of October 19, 2024, into
the morning of October 20, 2024, while Plaintiff was a full-time undergraduate student under the
care of Defendant CORNELL. 313. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded an undergraduate University campus, located at 616 Thurston Ave,
Ithaca, NY 14853. 314. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including the Greek Houses thereat. 58
315. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including the ALPHA BETA CHAPTER
sorority house, located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 316. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including the XI CHAPTER fraternity house,
located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 317. That at all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL was and is a private institution of
higher education with its principal address at 373 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca, New York 14850. 318. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained, operated and controlled the
private ivy-league university known as Cornell University, with a mailing address of 616 Thurston
Avenue, Ithaca, New York 14853. 319. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL was under a duty to operate, control,
manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house
in a safe, lawful, and proper fashion. 320. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL had a duty to safeguard and supervise
students utilizing the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, including
Plaintiff. 321. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL hired and employed certain individuals
to carry out its business operations, including police officers, faculty members, sponsors,
administrators, and supervisors. 322. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL, its agents, servants and/or employees
breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house,
high in a reasonably safe condition and manner. 59
323. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL, its agents, servants and/or employees
breached their duty to supervise its students, including Plaintiff DOE and Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, in a reasonably safe
manner. 324. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL owed Plaintiff a duty of care because
it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 325. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant CORNELL had a special relationship with Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 326. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant CORNELL had a contractual relationship with Plaintiff. 327. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant CORNELL had a contractual relationship with Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 328. By accepting Plaintiff as a full-time undergraduate student at the college campus,
sorority house, and fraternity house, and holding their facilities out to be a safe environment for
Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary relationship with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant
CORNELL entered into an express and/or implied duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide
a reasonably safe environment for students attending their University. Defendant CORNELL owed
Plaintiff a duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 329. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL breached its duties to the Plaintiff, as
these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant CORNELL failed to protect her. 330. Defendant CORNELLâs breach of their duties include, but are not limited to: failure 60
to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and procedures in place
to prevent sex abuse and assault being committed by any of their students; failure to properly
implement policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault; failure to take reasonable
measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault were working;
failure to investigate risks of sexual assault; failure to properly train the employees at their
facilities; failed to have any outside agency test their safety procedures; and failure to train its
employees properly to identify signs of sexual abuse and sexual assault. 331. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL failed to use ordinary care in
determining whether the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, were safe
for Plaintiff. 332. That prior to the subject incident, Defendant CORNELL knew or should have
known that XI CHAPTER had a history of drug-use culture, specifically ketamine. 333. Upon information and belief, one week prior to the subject assault, police
responded to a drug-related incident at the XI CHAPTER house. 334. Defendant CORNELL, by and through its agents, servants and/or employees,
became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and investigation, should
have become aware of Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS,
and KRETZSCHMARâ propensity to commit sexual assault and of the risk they posed to
Plaintiffâs safety. 335. At the very least, Defendant CORNELL knew, or should have known, that they did
not have sufficient information about whether the college campus, sorority house, and fraternity
house, were safe and if Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, 61
and KRETZSCHMAR posed a danger to fellow students, including Plaintiff, at Defendant
CORNELLâs University. 336. Defendant CORNELL breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to warn her of the
risks that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR posed and the risks of sexual assault occurring on the aforesaid college campus,
sorority house, and fraternity house, during the relevant time period. 337. The sexual abuse committed by the Student Defendant was, or should have been,
reasonably foreseeable to Defendant CORNELL. 338. Defendant CORNELL, its employees, managers, administrators, and staff were on
actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was being sexually abused by other students at
Defendant CORNELLâs University. 339. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 340. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant CORNELL, their agents, servants and/or employees, in
the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the aforesaid
college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, and its students and employees therein. 341. Defendant CORNELLâs actions were intentional, done with malice, cruelty and/or
a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were done in
conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs physical
and emotional wellbeing. Defendant CORNELLâs conduct was so outrageous, shocking,
despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by
what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard 62
for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to recover both
compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant CORNELL. 342. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity at Cornell University, with its
fraternity house located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 343. That at all relevant times, XI CHAPTER was and is a domestic not-for-profit
corporation which owned and operated the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi at Cornell Universityâs house
located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 344. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER was under a duty to operate, control,
manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid fraternity house in a safe, lawful, and proper
fashion. 345. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER had a duty to safeguard and
supervise students utilizing the aforesaid fraternity house, including Plaintiff and Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 346. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER hired and employed certain
individuals to carry out its business operations, including security guards, alumni, sponsors,
administrators, sober monitors, and supervisors. 347. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER, its agents, servants and/or
employees breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid fraternity house, high in a reasonably safe
condition and manner. 348. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER, its agents, servants and/or
employees breached their duty to supervise students utilizing the fraternity house, including
Plaintiff and Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and 63
KRETZSCHMAR, in a reasonably safe manner. 349. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty of care
because it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 350. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant XI CHAPTER had a special relationship with Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 351. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant XI CHAPTER had a contractual relationship with Defendant
CORNELL. 352. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant XI CHAPTER had a contractual relationship with Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 353. By accepting Plaintiff at the XI CHAPTER fraternity house, and holding their
facilities out to be a safe environment for Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary relationship
with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER entered into an express and/or implied
duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide a reasonably safe environment for students
utilizing its fraternity house. Defendant XI CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty to properly supervise
Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 354. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER breached its duties to the Plaintiff,
as these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant XI CHAPTER failed to protect her. 355. Defendant XI CHAPTERâs breach of their duties include, but are not limited to:
failure to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and procedures
in place to prevent sex abuse and assault being committed by any of their students; failure to 64
properly implement policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault; failure to take
reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault were
working; failure to investigate risks of sexual assault; failure to properly train the employees at
their facilities; failed to have any outside agency test their safety procedures; and failure to train
its employees properly to identify signs of sexual abuse and sexual assault. 356. At all times relevant, Defendant XI CHAPTER failed to use ordinary care in
determining whether the aforesaid fraternity house was safe for Plaintiff. 357. That prior to the subject incident, Defendant XI CHPTER knew or should have
known that XI CHAPTER had a history of drug-use culture, specifically ketamine. 358. Upon information and belief, one week prior to the subject assault, police
responded to a drug-related incident at the XI CHAPTER house. 359. Defendant XI CHAPTER, by and through its agents, servants and/or employees,
became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and investigation, should
have become aware of Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS,
and KRETZSCHMARâ propensity to commit sexual assault and of the risk they posed to
Plaintiffâs safety. 360. At the very least, Defendant XI CHAPTER knew, or should have known, that they
did not have sufficient information about whether the fraternity house was safe and if Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR posed a
danger to fellow students, including Plaintiff. 361. Defendant XI CHAPTER breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to warn her of
the risks that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and 65
KRETZSCHMAR posed and the risks of sexual assault occurring at the aforesaid fraternity house,
during the relevant time period. 362. The sexual abuse committed by the Student Defendant was, or should have been,
reasonably foreseeable to Defendant XI CHAPTER. 363. Defendant XI CHAPTER, its employees, managers, administrators, and staff were
on actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was being sexually abused by Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, members of
their fraternal organization, and within their fraternity house. 364. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 365. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant XI CHAPTER, their agents, servants and/or employees,
in the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the aforesaid
college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, and its students and employees therein. 366. Defendant XI CHAPTERâs actions were intentional, done with malice, cruelty
and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were done
in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs
physical and emotional wellbeing. Defendant XI CHAPTERâs conduct was so outrageous,
shocking, despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as
measured by what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter
disregard for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to recover both
compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant XI CHAPTER. 367. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL operated, controlled, 66
managed, supervised and/or funded the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi Fraternity at Cornell University,
with its fraternity house located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 368. That at all relevant times, CHI PHI NATIONAL was and is a domestic not-for-
profit corporation which owned and operated the Xi Chapter of Chi Phi at Cornell Universityâs
house located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 369. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL was under a duty to operate,
control, manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid fraternity house in a safe, lawful, and proper
fashion. 370. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL had a duty to safeguard and
supervise students utilizing the aforesaid fraternity house, including Plaintiff and Defendants
INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 371. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL hired and employed certain
individuals to carry out its business operations, including security guards, alumni, sponsors,
administrators, and supervisors. 372. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL, its agents, servants and/or
employees breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid fraternity house, high in a reasonably safe
condition and manner. 373. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL, its agents, servants and/or
employees breached their duty to supervise students utilizing the fraternity house, including
Plaintiff and Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR, in a reasonably safe manner. 374. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty of
care because it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 67
375. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty to
protect her from harm because Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL had a special relationship with
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR. 376. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty to
protect her from harm because Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL had a contractual relationship
with Defendant CORNELL. 377. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty to
protect her from harm because Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL had a contractual relationship
with Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR. 378. By accepting Plaintiff at the CHI PHI NATIONAL fraternity house, and holding
their facilities out to be a safe environment for Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary relationship
with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL entered into an express and/or
implied duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide a reasonably safe environment for students
utilizing its fraternity house. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty to properly
supervise Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 379. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached its duties to the
Plaintiff, as these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL failed
to protect her. 380. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONALâs breach of their duties include, but are not
limited to: failure to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and
procedures in place to prevent sex abuse and assault being committed by any of their students;
failure to properly implement policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault; failure to 68
take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse and assault
were working; failure to investigate risks of sexual assault; failure to properly train the employees
at their facilities; failed to have any outside agency test their safety procedures; and failure to train
its employees properly to identify signs of sexual abuse and sexual assault. 381. At all times relevant, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL failed to use ordinary care
in determining whether the aforesaid fraternity house was safe for Plaintiff. 382. That prior to the subject incident, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL knew or should
have known that XI CHAPTER had a history of drug-use culture, specifically ketamine. 383. Upon information and belief, one week prior to the subject assault, police
responded to a drug-related incident at the XI CHAPTER house. 384. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL, by and through its agents, servants and/or
employees, became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and
investigation, should have become aware of Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMARâs propensity to commit sexual assault and of the risk
they posed to Plaintiffâs safety. 385. At the very least, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL knew, or should have known,
that they did not have sufficient information about whether the fraternity house was safe and if
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR
posed a danger to fellow students, including Plaintiff. 386. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to warn
her of the risks that Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR posed and the risks of sexual assault occurring at the aforesaid fraternity house,
during the relevant time period. 69
387. The sexual abuse committed by the Student Defendant was, or should have been,
reasonably foreseeable to Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL. 388. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL, its employees, managers, administrators, and
staff were on actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was being sexually abused by
Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR,
members of their fraternal organization, and within their fraternity house. 389. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 390. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL, their agents, servants and/or
employees, in the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the
aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, and its students and employees
therein. 391. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONALâs actions were intentional, done with malice,
cruelty and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were
done in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs
physical and emotional wellbeing. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONALâs conduct was so outrageous,
shocking, despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as
measured by what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter
disregard for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to recover both
compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL. 392. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER operated, controlled,
managed, supervised and/or funded the Alpha Beta Chapter of Delta Delta Delta Sorority at 70
Cornell University, with a sorority house located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 393. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER was and is a domestic not-
for-profit corporation which owned and operated the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri Delta at Cornell
Universityâs house located at 118 Triphammer Road, Ithaca, New York 14580. 394. That at all relevant times, ALPHA BETA CHAPTER maintained and controlled
the regional chapter of Tri Deltaâs fraternal organization, known as the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri
Delta at Cornell University. 395. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER was under a duty to
operate, control, manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid sorority house in a safe, lawful,
and proper fashion. 396. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER had a duty to safeguard
and supervise students utilizing the aforesaid sorority house, including Plaintiff. 397. At all times relevant, Plaintiff resided within the aforesaid sorority house, of which
ALPHA BETA CHAPTER was fully aware. 398. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER hired and employed
certain individuals to carry out its business operations, including security guards, house mothers,
faculty sponsors, alumni, administrators, and supervisors. 399. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, its agents, servants
and/or employees breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid sorority house, high in a reasonably
safe condition and manner. 400. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, its agents, servants
and/or employees breached their duty to supervise its members, including Plaintiff, in a reasonably
safe manner. 71
401. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty
of care because it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 402. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty
to protect her from harm because Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER had a contractual
relationship with Plaintiff. 403. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER owed Plaintiff a duty
to protect her from harm because Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER had a contractual
relationship with CORNELL. 404. By accepting Plaintiff as a member of its sorority and a resident of its sorority, and
by holding its facilities out to be a safe environment for Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary
relationship with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER entered into
an express and/or implied duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide a reasonably safe
environment for its members and residents. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER owed Plaintiff
a duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 405. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER breached its duties to
the Plaintiff, as these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant ALPHA BETA
CHAPTER failed to protect her. 406. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs breach of their duties include, but are not
limited to: failure to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and
procedures in place to prevent sex abuse; failure to have sufficient policies and procedures in place
to prevent underage drinking; failure to properly implement policies and procedures to prevent sex
abuse; failure to properly implement policies and procedures to prevent underage drinking; failure
to take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse were 72
working; failure to take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent
underage drinking were working; failure to properly train the employees at their facilities,
including their house mothers; failure to properly train their members, including sober monitors;
failure to have any outside agency test their safety procedures; failure to train its employees
properly to identify signs of binge drinking. 407. At all times relevant, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER failed to use ordinary
care in determining whether the aforesaid sorority house was safe for Plaintiff. 408. That Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER knew or should have known that their
house mother, Jade, was not adequately trained to maintain their sorority house in a safe condition. 409. That Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER knew or should have known that their
house mother, Jade, was not maintaining their sorority house in a safe condition. 410. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, by and through its agents, servants and/or
employees, became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and
investigation, should have become aware of the risk underage, binge drinking posed to Plaintiffâs
safety. 411. At the very least, Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER knew, or should have
known, that they did not have sufficient information about whether the sorority house, were safe
and if there existed a risk of underage, binge drinking within its house and its social events. 412. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to
warn her of the risks of underage, binge drinking and the risks of sexual assault occurring on within
Greek Houses on campus, during the relevant time period. 413. The sexual abuse committed by the Student Defendant was, or should have been,
reasonably foreseeable to Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER. 73
414. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, its employees, managers, administrators,
and staff were on actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was underage and was binge
drinking at its house and social events. 415. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 416. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTER, their agents, servants and/or
employees, in the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the
aforesaid sorority house, and its members and employees therein. 417. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs actions were intentional, done with
malice, cruelty and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights
and were done in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to
Plaintiffâs physical and emotional wellbeing. Defendant ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs conduct was
so outrageous, shocking, despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of
decency as measured by what the average member of the community would tolerate and
demonstrates an utter disregard for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is
entitled to recover both compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant ALPHA BETA
CHAPTER. 418. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL operated, controlled,
managed, supervised and/or funded the Alpha Beta Chapter of Delta Delta Delta at Cornell
University, with a sorority house located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 419. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL was and is a domestic not-for-
profit corporation which owned and operated the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri Delta at Cornell 74
Universityâs house located at 118 Triphammer Road, Ithaca, New York 14580. 420. That at all relevant times, TRI-DELTA NATIONAL maintained and controlled the
regional chapter of Tri Deltaâs fraternal organization, known as the Alpha Beta Chapter of Tri
Delta at Cornell University. 421. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL was under a duty to
operate, control, manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid sorority house in a safe, lawful,
and proper fashion. 422. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL had a duty to safeguard
and supervise students utilizing the aforesaid sorority house, including Plaintiff. 423. At all times relevant, Plaintiff resided within the aforesaid sorority house, of which
TRI-DELTA NATIONAL was fully aware. 424. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL hired and employed
certain individuals to carry out its business operations, including security guards, house mothers,
faculty sponsors, alumni, administrators, and supervisors. 425. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, its agents, servants
and/or employees breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid sorority house, high in a reasonably
safe condition and manner. 426. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, its agents, servants
and/or employees breached their duty to supervise its members, including Plaintiff, in a reasonably
safe manner. 427. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty
of care because it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 75
428. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty
to protect her from harm because Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL had a contractual
relationship with Plaintiff. 429. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL owed Plaintiff a duty
to protect her from harm because Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL had a contractual
relationship with CORNELL. 430. By accepting Plaintiff as a member of its sorority and a resident of its sorority, and
by holding its facilities out to be a safe environment for Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary
relationship with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL entered into
an express and/or implied duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide a reasonably safe
environment for its members and residents. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL owed Plaintiff
a duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 431. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL breached its duties to
the Plaintiff, as these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL
failed to protect her. 432. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs breach of their duties include, but are not
limited to: failure to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and
procedures in place to prevent sex abuse; failure to have sufficient policies and procedures in place
to prevent underage drinking; failure to properly implement policies and procedures to prevent sex
abuse; failure to properly implement policies and procedures to prevent underage drinking; failure
to take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent sex abuse were
working; failure to take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent
underage drinking were working; failure to properly train the employees at their facilities, 76
including their house mothers; failure to properly train their members, including sober monitors;
failure to have any outside agency test their safety procedures; failure to train its employees
properly to identify signs of binge drinking. 433. At all times relevant, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL failed to use ordinary
care in determining whether the aforesaid sorority house was safe for Plaintiff. 434. That Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL knew or should have known that their
house mother, Jade, was not adequately trained to maintain their sorority house in a safe condition. 435. That Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL knew or should have known that their
house mother, Jade, was not maintaining their sorority house in a safe condition. 436. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, by and through its agents, servants and/or
employees, became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and
investigation, should have become aware of the risk underage, binge drinking posed to Plaintiffâs
safety. 437. At the very least, Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL knew, or should have
known, that they did not have sufficient information about whether their sorority house were safe
and if there existed a risk of underage, binge drinking within its house and its social events. 438. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to
warn her of the risks of underage, binge drinking and the risks of sexual assault occurring on within
Greek Houses on campus, during the relevant time period. 439. The sexual abuse committed by the Student Defendant was, or should have been,
reasonably foreseeable to Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL. 440. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, its employees, managers, administrators,
and staff were on actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was underage and was binge 77
drinking at its house and social events. 441. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 442. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONAL, their agents, servants and/or
employees, in the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the
aforesaid sorority house, and its members and employees therein. 443. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs actions were intentional, done with malice,
cruelty and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were
done in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs
physical and emotional wellbeing. Defendant TRI-DELTA NATIONALâs conduct was so
outrageous, shocking, despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of
decency as measured by what the average member of the community would tolerate and
demonstrates an utter disregard for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is
entitled to recover both compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant TRI-DELTA
NATIONAL. 444. That at all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES was and is a domestic limited
liability company with its principal address located at 409 Eddy Street, Ithaca, New York, 14850. 445. That at all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES maintained, controlled, and
operated Moonies Bar & Nightclub located at 114 E State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. 446. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES was under a duty to operate, control,
manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid Bar & Nightclub in a safe, lawful, and proper
fashion. 78
447. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES had a duty to safeguard and supervise
students utilizing the aforesaid Bar & Nightclub, including Plaintiff. 448. At all times relevant, Plaintiff resided within the aforesaid Bar & Nightclub, of
which MOONIES was fully aware. 449. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES hired and employed certain individuals
to carry out its business operations, including security guards, bartenders, servers, administrators,
and supervisors. 450. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES, its agents, servants and/or employees
breached their duty to maintain the aforesaid Bar & Nightclub, high in a reasonably safe condition
and manner. 451. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES, its agents, servants and/or employees
breached their duty to supervise its guests and/or invitees, including Plaintiff, in a reasonably safe
manner. 452. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES owed Plaintiff a duty of care because
it had a special relationship with Plaintiff. 453. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant MOONIES had a contractual relationship with Plaintiff. 454. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES owed Plaintiff a duty to protect her
from harm because Defendant MOONIES had a contractual relationship with ALPHA BETA
CHAPTER. 455. By accepting Plaintiff, and by holding its facilities out to be a safe environment for
Plaintiff, and by establishing a fiduciary relationship with Plaintiff at all times relevant, Defendant
MOONIES entered into an express and/or implied duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and provide 79
a reasonably safe environment for her at its Bar & Nightclub. Defendant MOONIES owed Plaintiff
a duty to properly supervise Plaintiff and protect her from foreseeable dangers. 456. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES breached its duties to the Plaintiff, as
these harms were reasonably foreseeable and Defendant MOONIES failed to protect her. 457. Defendant MOONIESâs breach of their duties include, but are not limited to: failure
to protect Plaintiff from a known danger; failure to have sufficient policies and procedures in place
to prevent overpouring and serving alcohol to minors; failure to have sufficient policies and
procedures in place to prevent underage drinking; failure to properly implement policies and
procedures to prevent overpouring and serving alcohol to minors; failure to properly implement
policies and procedures to prevent underage drinking; failure to take reasonable measures to ensure
that policies and procedures to overpouring and serving alcohol to minors were working; failure
to take reasonable measures to ensure that policies and procedures to prevent underage drinking
were working; failure to properly train the employees at their facilities, including their bartenders
servers, and/or security guards; failure to have any outside agency test their safety procedures;
failure to train its employees properly to identify signs of binge drinking and intoxication. 458. At all times relevant, Defendant MOONIES failed to use ordinary care in
determining whether the aforesaid Bar & Nightclub was safe for Plaintiff. 459. Defendant MOONIES, by and through its agents, servants and/or employees,
became aware, or through the exercise of reasonable care, supervision, and investigation, should
have become aware of the risk underage, binge drinking posed to Plaintiffâs safety. 460. At the very least, Defendant MOONIES knew, or should have known, that they did
not have sufficient information about whether the Bar & Nightclub were safe and if there existed
a risk of underage, binge drinking within its Bar & Nightclub. 80
461. The sexual abuse committed by Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR was, or should have been, reasonably foreseeable to
Defendant MOONIES. 462. Defendant MOONIES, its employees, managers, administrators, and staff were on
actual and/or constructive notice that Plaintiff was underage and was binge drinking at its Bar &
Nightclub. 463. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained emotional and
psychological injuries, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 464. The subject assault and resultant injuries were caused by, and through reason of the
negligence and carelessness of Defendant MOONIES, their agents, servants and/or employees, in
the ownership, operation, management, supervision, maintenance and control of the aforesaid Bar
& Nightclub, and its employees therein. 465. Defendant MOONIESâs actions were intentional, done with malice, cruelty and/or
a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were done in
conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs physical
and emotional wellbeing. Defendant MOONIESâs conduct was so outrageous, shocking,
despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by
what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard
for the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to recover both
compensatory and punitive damages from Defendant MOONIES. 466. The amount of damages sought exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts
which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT 81
467. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 468. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL entered into a binding contract with
Plaintiff, through written enrollment agreements, student handbooks, codes of conduct, policies,
and other official publications, pursuant to which Defendant CORNELL expressly and impliedly
promised to provide a reasonably safe educational environment, to implement established safety
protocols, and to take reasonable measures to protect students from foreseeable harm. 469. The terms of Defendant CORNELLâs contract with Plaintiff included, but were not
limited to: (a) CORNELLâs obligation to maintain campus safety in accordance with its published
policies; (b) CORNELLâs obligation to enforce its own procedures for preventing, investigating,
and responding to threats of harm; and (c) CORNELLâs obligation to act in accordance with
representations made to students and parents regarding safety, security, and protection from
misconduct. 470. Plaintiff fully performed all her obligations under the contract, including paying all
tuition and fees, complying with campus rules, and remaining a student in good standing. 471. Defendant CORNELL breached the contract by failing to adhere to its stated safety
policies and procedures; failing to take reasonable and required steps to prevent foreseeable harm
to Plaintiff; failing to respond appropriately to reports or indicators of danger; and otherwise failing
to deliver the level of security and protection that CORNELL represented it would provide. 472. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CORNELLâs breach of contract,
Plaintiff suffered physical injury, emotional distress, financial losses, and other damages, all in an
amount to be determined at trial. 473. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to compensatory damages, consequential damages, 82
pre- and post-judgment interest, costs, and such other and further relief as the Court deems just
and proper. 474. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, EXEC. LAW § 296, ET SEQ. 475. Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation in all of the preceding
paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 476. The Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 290 et seq.) declares that: It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any person, being the owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent or employee of any place of public accommodation, resort or amusement, because of the race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability, marital status, or status as a victim of domestic violence, of any person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from or deny to such person any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges thereof, including the extension of credit, or, directly or indirectly, to publish, circulate, issue, display, post or mail any written or printed communication, notice or advertisement, to the effect that any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities and privileges of any such place shall be refused, withheld from or denied to any person on account of race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability or marital status, or that the patronage or custom thereat of any person of or purporting to be of any particular race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex or marital status, or having a disability is unwelcome, objectionable or not acceptable, desired or solicited. Executive Law § 296 [2][a]). 83
477. New York courts have repeatedly held that colleges and universities qualify as
places of public accommodation, which makes them subject to the NYSHRLâs anti-discrimination
provisions. 478. Further, the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 290 et seq.) declares that: It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an educational institution to deny the use of its facilities to any person otherwise qualified, or to permit the harassment of any student or applicant, by reason of his race, color, religion, disability, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, age, marital status, or status as a victim of domestic violence, except that any such institution which establishes or maintains a policy of educating persons of one sex exclusively may admit students of only one sex. Executive Law § 296 [4]). 479. As such, the NYSHRL also covers educational institutions, whether the university
and/or college is public or private. 480. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL was an institution of higher education
subject to Executive Law § 296, which mandates that colleges adopt, implement, and enforce
specific policies and procedures to prevent, investigate, and respond to sexual assault, harassment,
violence, and other forms of misconduct affecting students. 481. That during the subject period complained of herein, Plaintiff was a full-time
undergraduate student attending CORNELLâs University in Ithaca, NY. 482. That Plaintiff is a female. 483. That during the subject period complained of herein, Plaintiff resided upon
CORNELLâs University campus located at 616 Thurston Ave, Ithaca, NY 14853. 484. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded an undergraduate University campus, located at 616 Thurston Ave, 84
Ithaca, NY 14853. 485. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including the Greek Houses thereat. 486. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including ALPHA BETA CHAPTERâs sorority
house, located at 118 Triphammer Rd, Ithaca, New York 14850. 487. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL operated, controlled, managed,
supervised and/or funded the University campus, including the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house,
located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 488. That at all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL was and is a private institution of
higher education with its principal address at 373 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca, New York 14850. 489. That at all relevant times, CORNELL maintained, operated and controlled the
private ivy-league university known as Cornell University, with a mailing address of 616 Thurston
Avenue, Ithaca, New York 14853. 490. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL was under a duty to operate, control,
manage, supervise, and maintain the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house
in a safe, lawful, and proper fashion. 491. At all times relevant, Defendant CORNELL had a duty to safeguard and supervise
students utilizing the aforesaid college campus, sorority house, and fraternity house, including
Plaintiff. 492. That CORNELLâs herein described discriminatory conduct was so severe or
widespread or persistent that a reasonable woman would consider the educational environment to 85
be hostile and created an environment where sexual assault and rape of persons such as Plaintiff
would be tolerated. 493. That Plaintiff considers she was subjected to the hereinabove sexual assault and
rape because she was a female. 494. Defendant CORNELL discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of her gender in
violation of the NYSHRL by subjecting Plaintiff to disparate treatment based upon her gender,
including, but not limited to, subjecting her to sexual assault and/or harassment and rape. 495. Defendant CORNELL knew or should have known of the prevalent and historic
discriminatory harassment young female students, such as Plaintiff herein, experienced on its
college campus. 496. Despite having this knowledge, Defendant CORNELL failed to take appropriate
corrective action, resulting in bodily harm to Plaintiff as further described herein. 497. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CORNELLâs unlawful
discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer,
monetary and/or economic harm for which she is entitled to an award of monetary damages and
other relief. 498. That Defendant CORNELL, its employees, managers, supervisors, executives
and/or directors, were aware of the prevalence of sexual assault in its fraternity houses, and knew
or should have known of the Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMARâs propensity to commit further misconduct. 499. That Defendant CORNELL, its employees, managers, supervisors, executives and
directors, knowing of the Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, 86
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMARâs propensity to commit such conduct, either accepted or
approved it, by allowing them unfettered access to Plaintiff. 500. That Plaintiff was harmed because of the aforesaid conduct. 501. That the Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMARâs derelict behavior was obvious, highly persistent, widespread
and was severely offensive in nature and well known to Defendant CORNELL. 502. That said behavior and conduct had a negative effect on Plaintiffâs well-being. 503. That the conduct was humiliating and/or physically threatening to Plaintiff. 504. That the conduct unreasonably interfered with Plaintiffâs educational performance. 505. The Student Defendantsâ misconduct and/or propensity to commit such conduct as
alleged herein was previously known to Defendant CORNELL, its employees, managers,
supervisors, executives and directors, which facilitated their unlawful, abusive and predatory
sexual misconduct by, among other things allowing the Student Defendants to gain unfettered
access to Plaintiff, providing them with an opportunity to sexually assault and rape Plaintiff, failing
to discipline or remove the Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR from campus afterwards, all the while sheltering them from
speaking to law enforcement, and silencing victims. 506. That Defendants CORNELLâs discriminatory acts and/or omissions resulted in
harm to Plaintiff that has a sufficient connection to the State of New York to establish liability
under New York State Human Rights Law. 507. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CORNELLâs unlawful
discriminatory conduct in violation of the NYSHRL, Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer
severe mental anguish and emotional distress for which she is entitled to an award of monetary 87
damages and other relief. Defendant CORNELLâs unlawful and discriminatory actions were
intentional, done with malice and/or showed a deliberate, willful, wanton and reckless indifference
to Plaintiffâs rights under the NYSHRL for which Plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive
damages. 508. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant CORNELLâs unlawful conduct as
alleged hereinabove, Plaintiff has suffered physical injury, severe emotional distress and anxiety,
humiliation, embarrassment, economic harm and other consequential damages. 509. That this action falls within one or more of the exceptions set forth in CPLR §1602,
specifically: (5) (due to Defendantâs intentional conduct), (7) (as Defendant acted with reckless
disregard), (8) Article Ten of the Labor Law, (11) (as Defendant acted knowingly or intentionally,
and in concert). 510. That this action falls within one or more of the exceptions set forth in CPLR §1601,
as with due diligence, Plaintiff is unable to obtain jurisdiction over any such person that may have
any fault in this matter aside from Defendant CORNELL herein, and in that Defendant CORNELL
was vicariously responsible for any possible additional parties with liability herein. 511. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION: SEXUAL ASSAULT 512. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 513. In committing and threatening to commit the sexual assault described herein,
Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR had the real and apparent ability to cause imminent harmful or offensive bodily 88
contact to Plaintiff and intentionally did a menacing act which threatened such contact to Plaintiff,
when Plaintiff was within the XI CHAPTERâs fraternity house on CORNELLâs campus. 514. The sexual assault and exploitation, and threatened sexual assault and exploitation,
by Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR caused apprehension of such contact in Plaintiff. 515. The alleged conduct constituted sexual assault. 516. The alleged conduct constituted a violation of N.Y. Pen. Law §130.52 §130.55,
§130.60 and §130.65, and this action to recover damages from such conduct is protected under
CPLR §208(b). 517. As a direct and proximate result of that intentional harmful or offensive conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and special damages. 518. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION: SEXUAL BATTERY 519. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 520. In committing the sexual assault described herein, Student Defendants INGALLS,
NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR touched Plaintiff, a fellow
CORNELL student, without Plaintiffâs informed consent and with the intention of causing harmful
or offensive bodily contact to Plaintiff. 521. The alleged conduct constituted sexual battery. 522. The alleged conduct constituted a violation of N.Y. Pen. Law §130.52 §130.55,
§130.60 and §130.65, and this action to recover damages from such conduct is protected under 89
CPLR §208(b). 523. As a direct and proximate result of that intentional harmful or offensive contact,
Plaintiff suffered general and special damages. 524. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 525. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 526. At all times relevant, Defendant INGALLS, engaged in reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not
possibly consent. 527. At all times relevant, Defendant INGALLSâs misconduct was so shocking and
outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
INGALLS of the consequences that would follow. 528. At all times relevant, Defendant INGALLS knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 529. As a result of Defendant INGALLSâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 90
530. At all times relevant, Defendant NEWELL, engaged in reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not
possibly consent. 531. At all times relevant, Defendant NEWELLâs misconduct was so shocking and
outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
NEWELL of the consequences that would follow. 532. At all times relevant, Defendant NEWELL knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 533. As a result of Defendant NEWELLâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 534. At all times relevant, Defendant LEE, engaged in reckless, extreme, and outrageous
conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not possibly
consent. 535. At all times relevant, Defendant LEEâs misconduct was so shocking and outrageous
that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average member or the
community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant LEE of the
consequences that would follow. 536. At all times relevant, Defendant LEE knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and 91
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 537. As a result of Defendant LEEâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff
suffered general and specialized damages. 538. At all times relevant, Defendant LOPES, engaged in reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not
possibly consent. 539. At all times relevant, Defendant LOPESâs misconduct was so shocking and
outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
LOPES of the consequences that would follow. 540. At all times relevant, Defendant LOPES knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 541. As a result of Defendant LOPESâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 542. At all times relevant, Defendant SARABIA, engaged in reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not
possibly consent. 543. At all times relevant, Defendant SARABIAâs misconduct was so shocking and
outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average 92
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
SARABIA of the consequences that would follow. 544. At all times relevant, Defendant SARABIA knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 545. As a result of Defendant SARABIAâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 546. At all times relevant, Defendant NORRIS, engaged in reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could not
possibly consent. 547. At all times relevant, Defendant NORRISâs misconduct was so shocking and
outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
NORRIS of the consequences that would follow. 548. At all times relevant, Defendant NORRIS knew that this reckless, extreme, and
outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on Plaintiff, and
Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result, including severe
mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 549. As a result of Defendant NORRISâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct,
Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 93
550. At all times relevant, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR, engaged in reckless, extreme,
and outrageous conduct by sexually assaulting Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incapacitated and could
not possibly consent. 551. At all times relevant, Defendant KRETZSCHMARâs misconduct was so shocking
and outrageous that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member or the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard by Defendant
KRETZSCHMAR of the consequences that would follow. 552. At all times relevant, Defendant KRETZSCHMAR knew that this reckless,
extreme, and outrageous conduct would inflict severe emotional and psychological distress on
Plaintiff, and Plaintiff did in fact suffer severe emotional and psychological distress as a result,
including severe mental anguish, humiliation, and emotional and physical distress. 553. As a result of Defendant KRETZSCHMARâs reckless, extreme, and outrageous
conduct, Plaintiff suffered general and specialized damages. 554. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION: NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 555. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 556. At all relevant times, Defendant CORNELL owed a duty to Plaintiff because she
was a full-time undergraduate student entrusted to their protection and care. 557. Defendant CORNELL breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to make proper
regulations, protocols and/or employ proper persons and instrumentalities in assessing risk of harm
to students; permitting and/or intentionally failing and/or neglecting to prevent the commissions 94
of tortious conduct upon students within their care; failing to adequately supervise the activities of
Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR; and allowing all acts or omissions and/or any of the above-described actions. 558. Defendant CORNELL breached their duty to Plaintiff by negligently supervising
Plaintiff as well as Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, and in failing to protect Plaintiff from sexual predators on
CORNELLâs campus. 559. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was sexually assaulted
by Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR. 560. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 561. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 562. Defendant CORNELLâs actions were intentional, done with malice, cruelty and/or
a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were done in
conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs physical
and emotional wellbeing. CORNELLâs conduct was so outrageous, shocking, despicable, and
contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average
member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard of the consequences
that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to the recovery of both compensatory and
punitive damages from CORNELL. 95
563. As a result of that reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff suffered
general and specialized damages. 564. At all relevant times, Defendant XI CHAPTER owed a duty to Plaintiff because
she was a guest and/or invitee on its premises, entrusted to their protection and care. 565. Defendant XI CHAPTER breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to make proper
regulations, protocols and/or employ proper persons and instrumentalities in assessing risk of harm
to guests and/or invitees; permitting and/or intentionally failing and/or neglecting to prevent the
commissions of tortious conduct upon students within their care; failing to adequately supervise
the activities of Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS,
and KRETZSCHMAR; and allowing all acts or omissions and/or any of the above-described
actions. 566. Defendant XI CHAPTER breached their duty to Plaintiff by negligently
supervising Plaintiff as well as Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, and in failing to protect Plaintiff from sexual
predators within its fraternity house. 567. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was sexually assaulted
by Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR. 568. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 569. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 96
570. Defendant XI CHAPTERâs actions were intentional, done with malice, cruelty
and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were done
in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs
physical and emotional wellbeing. XI CHAPTERâs conduct was so outrageous, shocking,
despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by
what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard of
the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to the recovery of both
compensatory and punitive damages from XI CHAPTER. 571. As a result of that reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff suffered
general and specialized damages. 572. At all relevant times, Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL owed a duty to Plaintiff
because she was a guest and/or invitee, entrusted to their protection and care. 573. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached their duty to Plaintiff by failing to make
proper regulations, protocols and/or employ proper persons and instrumentalities in assessing risk
of harm to guests and/or invitees; permitting and/or intentionally failing and/or neglecting to
prevent the commissions of tortious conduct upon students within their care; failing to adequately
supervise the activities of Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA,
NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR; and allowing all acts or omissions and/or any of the above-
described actions. 574. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONAL breached their duty to Plaintiff by negligently
supervising Plaintiff as well as Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES,
SARABIA, NORRIS, and KRETZSCHMAR, and in failing to protect Plaintiff from sexual
predators within its fraternity house. 97
575. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff was sexually assaulted
by Student Defendants INGALLS, NEWELL, LEE, LOPES, SARABIA, NORRIS, and
KRETZSCHMAR. 576. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 577. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained psychological
injuries, severe emotional distress, along with pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. 578. Defendant CHI PHI NATIONALâs actions were intentional, done with malice,
cruelty and/or a deliberate, willful, wanton, and reckless indifference to Plaintiffâs rights and were
done in conscious disregard of the probability that the conduct would result in harm to Plaintiffâs
physical and emotional wellbeing. CHI PHI NATIONALâs conduct was so outrageous, shocking,
despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by
what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard of
the consequences that would follow. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to the recovery of both
compensatory and punitive damages from CHI PHI NATIONAL. 579. As a result of that reckless, extreme, and outrageous conduct, Plaintiff suffered
general and specialized damages. 580. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. 581. Pursuant to CPLR § 1603, the foregoing causes of action are exempt from the
operation of CPLR 1601 by reason of one or more of the exemptions provided in CPLR 1602,
including but not limited to, CPLR 1602(2), CPLR 1602(5), CPLR 1602(7) and CPLR 1602(11), 98
thus precluding defendants from limiting their liability by apportioning some portion of liability
to any joint tortfeasor. AS AND FOR AN TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION: VIOLATIONS OF NEW YORKâS DRAM SHOP ACT GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW §§11-100 â 11-101 582. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in the
paragraphs above, as if the same were set forth more fully at length herein. 583. That at all relevant times, Defendant MOONIES maintained, controlled, and
operated Moonies Bar & Nightclub located at 114 E State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. 584. That at all relevant times, MOONIES maintained a liquor license for Moonies Bar
& Nightclub, where MOONIES, its employees, servants and agents, served invitees and/or guests
with alcoholic beverages. 585. That at all relevant times, MOONIES held itself out to the public, and more
particularly to Plaintiff herein, as possessing the proper degree of safety measure to adequately
protect its invitees and/or guests and to use reasonable care and diligence in its monitoring and
policing of Moonies Bar & Nightclub and those utilizing the premises thereat. 586. That at all relevant times, MOONIES, its employees, servants and/or agents served
Plaintiff with alcoholic beverages even though she had an âXâ on both her hands, signifying she
was under 21 years old. 587. That at all relevant times, MOONIES, its employees, servants and/or agents
continued serving Plaintiff with alcoholic beverages to the point of visible intoxication. 588. That at all relevant times, MOONIES, its employees, servants and/or agents
continued serving Plaintiff with alcoholic beverages beyond the point of visible intoxication. 589. That as a result of MOONIES violating New Yorkâs Dram Shop Act, General 99
Obligations Law §§11-100 â 11-101, Plaintiff was rendered helpless. 590. That as a result of MOONIES violating New Yorkâs Dram Shop Act, General
Obligations Law §§11-100 â 11-101, Plaintiff suffered bodily injury. 591. That as a result of MOONIES violating New Yorkâs Dram Shop Act, General
Obligations Law §§11-100 â 11-101, Plaintiff was sexually assaulted and raped by members of
CHI PHIâs Xi Chapter at Cornell University, at the fraternity house known as Chi Phi Fraternity
located at 107 Edgemoor Ln, Ithaca, New York 14850. 592. As a result of the subject incident, Plaintiff has sustained injury, emotional pain and
suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and claims compensatory and punitive
damages herein. 593. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction. JURY DEMAND 594. Plaintiff JANE DOE hereby demands a trial by jury. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff JANE DOE demands judgment against the Defendants and each of
them, on the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Causes
of Action as follows: A. Awarding compensatory damages in an amount to be proved at trial, but in any event in an amount that exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction to the extent permitted by law; B. Awarding punitive damages to the extent permitted by law; C. Awarding costs and fees of this action, including attorneysâ fees to the extent permitted by law; D. Awarding prejudgment interest to the extent permitted by law; and E. Awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York 100
September 14, 2026
RHEINGOLD GIUFFRA RUFFO
PLOTKIN & HELLMAN LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff By: ______________________________ Thomas P. Giuffra, Esq. 551 Fifth Avenue, 29th Fl. New York, NY 10176 Tel: (212) 684-1880 tgiuffra@rheingoldlaw.com COCHRUN & SEALS, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff (Pro Hac Vice pending) /s/ W. Whitney Seals ________________________ By: W. Whitney Seals, Esq. P.O. Box 10448 Birmingham, AL 35202-0448 Tel: (202) 323-3900 whitney@cochrunseals.com 101